Affected tag to be modified/added: mapillary or other photo tag
Quests asked:
tourism=information is used for tourist information boards, guideposts and maps etc. For these three sub-categories, the quest would ask the user to take a photo of the board, guidepost or map. StreetComplete would then upload the photo to a (free, open, long-term accessible) photo hosting site under a free copyright license (Creative Commons or Public Domain) and link it via Photo linking to the OSM object.
Information boards or maps are very useful also for planning a trip to some area. Accessing them online before visiting them on-site will be a huge advantage and might prevent large detours.
Checklist for quest suggestions (see guidelines):
Element selection:
Filter to show only tourism information elements (e.g. information boards) which do not have any photo link yet: Overpass Turbo example
Only elements in countries with Freedom of Panorama should be selected. Otherwise, the user would have to check the copyright law of their country first.
Proposed GUI:
There should be an automatic upload to mapillary or another photo hosting service which allows login with OSM account. There is already existing work for StreetComplete to add photos as answers of quests here:
Related quest proposals (about tourism information): https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/1226, https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/1115
The very similar quest proposal https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/952 for asking for photos has been rejected before.
Thank you @rugk for the cross references and hinting at previous problems with photo quests.
However, there might be guideposts, e.g., consisting only of arrows without any text. Thus, there should be the option to flag these _guideposts without text_ with the tag inscription=no instead of uploading a photo. No quest should be shown if there is any inscription tag already, just to be on the safe side. In the GUI, there should also be an option to upload several photos, e.g., if there is a back side of the guidepost or board which also contains information.
The other issue discussed in #952 was that it would be better/easier to photo link existing entries in Wikimedia Commons first. I totally agree with this because Wikimedia Commons photos tend to be of high quality and usually depict interesting objects. Thus, I would really like to have this done semi-automatically, e.g., via Pic4Review. However, for most information boards, maps and (especially) guideposts, the probability that there is already a photo in Wikimedia Commons is quite low because the majority of photos there tends to be of important or at least named objects.
Although I would (even very much) prefer Wikimedia Commons over mapillary for storing single photos like the requested ones, I hope mapillary will be easier to use/implement because it offers login/sign up via OSM.
Mapillary automatically blurs faces and license plates. If mapillary blurs a board or guidepost by mistake, we can request to unblur it via their admin review.
At least some local authority decided that there is something worthy enough to explain to set up the board or map.
…which yields the question whether the object should be photographed or the information board. (or both, in one photo – which could be possible)
Thank you for your idea, @rugk. However, there are many information boards which do not describe a specific object but rather abstract concepts like the nature or history of a region. There is no easy way for us to decide whether there is a specific photo-worthy object just from the OSM data. Thus, the problem from #952 how to decide this question would show up again if we allow taking photos of the objects too.
Hence, for taking photos of specific objects like monuments, I would suggest to create new quests here. There we could discuss about the filters to come up with a good set of photo-worthy objects. I would suggest, e.g., historic=monument, historic=memorial and denotation=natural_monument as a beginning. However, we have to bear in mind that for these different forms of "monuments" there are usually already photos in Wikimedia Commons. Therefore, I would strongly suggest to first create a method to photo link these existing resources somehow semi-automagically, which is not within the scope of StreetComplete, but rather concerns projects like Pic4Review. (Any experts here who could set up such tasks?)
Just another thought on the actual topic of this thread: The app should tag the automatically uploaded photos on mapillary in a unique category, e.g., Information-Board-via-StreetComplete. Thereby, the photos can be easily reused later on, e.g., when we come up (maybe even somewhere else) with a follow-up task, e.g., determining the language of the text on the board or even making it machine-readable via OCR.
Wow _Pic4Review_ is a really nice project. And yet another nice OSM tool that nobody can find… :roll_eyes:
Yeah, pretty cool idea and execution. You can vote for it in the upcoming OSM awards in the category "innovation".
On August 8, 2019 12:36:04 PM GMT+02:00, rugk notifications@github.com wrote:
Wow _Pic4Review_ is a really nice project. And yet another nice OSM
tool that nobody can find… :roll_eyes: >
>
-- >
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.>
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:>
https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/1515#issuecomment-519464822
OSM awards
Also did not know, _such a_ thing exists… link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_Awards (don't know how you know the candidates for 2019, however)
OSM awards
Also did not know, _such a_ thing exists… link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_Awards (don't know how you know the candidates for 2019, however)
You can already vote for the 2019 Awards: http://awards.osmz.ru/
There is also an app from wikimedia commons with which you can quickly contribute photos:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Mobile_app
Most helpful comment
Yeah, pretty cool idea and execution. You can vote for it in the upcoming OSM awards in the category "innovation".
On August 8, 2019 12:36:04 PM GMT+02:00, rugk notifications@github.com wrote: