Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask.
My understanding was that a
Can't find it, however, nor any information.
Is there a time-frame?
Is it still recommended to use {fmt} for quite a while?
nuuSolutions
All 5 comments
You might want to have a look at #1232
miscco
on 27 Aug 2020
Is it still recommended to use {fmt} for quite a while?
Note that std::format is not a fully drop in replacement. It doesn't have literals, a fmt::memory_buffer equivalent, or compile-time checking of the format string (although that will probably be something compilers implement in the future) so you should review or correct your usage to make sure that std::format fits it. fmt::memory_buffer, for example, will have to be replaced by your own memory buffer implementation, if you use it.
sylveon
on 27 Aug 2020
Thanks for the warning.
I was trying to avoid those (future) problems by using a current STL implementation which I believed to be open source.
I'm just unable to find the code.
nuuSolutions
on 28 Aug 2020
As @miscco noted, @barcharcraz is working on <format>; #1232 is the first of what should be several PRs (we're using a feature branch feature/format to collect this work). #30 is the tracking issue for the feature (one of 24 remaining C++20 features). It's a big feature, so we can't promise when it'll be done, but we're working on it :smile_cat:
StephanTLavavej
on 28 Aug 2020
Got it, thx.
nuuSolutions
on 28 Aug 2020
Related issues
cbezault
路
15Comments
ohhmm
路
16Comments
ohhmm
路
32Comments
jonwil
路
24Comments
ZaldronGG
路
17Comments
Most helpful comment
As @miscco noted, @barcharcraz is working on
<format>; #1232 is the first of what should be several PRs (we're using a feature branchfeature/formatto collect this work). #30 is the tracking issue for the feature (one of 24 remaining C++20 features). It's a big feature, so we can't promise when it'll be done, but we're working on it :smile_cat: