Srt: Switch project to the Apache License

Created on 9 Jan 2018  路  11Comments  路  Source: Haivision/srt

Enhancement
Source
picture adamyellen

Most helpful comment

I'm in support of this change.

picture russelltg on 9 Jan 2018
👍3

All 11 comments

I'm in support of this change.

russelltg picture russelltg on 9 Jan 2018
👍3

I am in favor of changing the license to Apache 2.0.

jlsantiago0 picture jlsantiago0 on 10 Jan 2018
👍1

I support this idea.

ethouris picture ethouris on 10 Jan 2018
👍1

I support this change.

blakewenzel picture blakewenzel on 10 Jan 2018
👍2

I am in favor of the proposed license change

rndi picture rndi on 11 Jan 2018
👍1

I support this change.

cdunklau picture cdunklau on 11 Jan 2018
👍1

I support this change.

stevomatthews picture stevomatthews on 12 Jan 2018
👍1

@alexpokotilo @SSE4 @jbroberg @midicase
Do I have your permission?

adamyellen picture adamyellen on 15 Jan 2018

Yes

jbroberg picture jbroberg on 15 Jan 2018
👍1

Yes, sure. LGPL was fine. R.I.P:) Apache is much better.
I want to thank Haivision for this movement.

alexpokotilo picture alexpokotilo on 16 Jan 2018
👍1

After further reflection I believe the MPL-2.0 is a more appropriate license for this project. The MPL-2.0 is more permissive than the current LGPL-2.1 while affording the contributors/authors more protection than the APL. The MPL-2.0 would ensure that the SRT source code files, modified or not, must be made available upon distribution of a larger work -- something the APL lacks.

I'm going to close this issue and open a new issue.

adamyellen picture adamyellen on 16 Jan 2018
👍1
Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

aamirrad picture aamirrad  路  4Comments
oviano picture oviano  路  6Comments
vandanachadha picture vandanachadha  路  6Comments
amukhsimov picture amukhsimov  路  3Comments
stevomatthews picture stevomatthews  路  7Comments