the first example is still used pragma solidity ^0.4.16 as the other examples in the same doc already update to ^0.4.21;
and in this example, it still have out of date comment for require
// If the argument of `require` evaluates to `false`,
// it terminates and reverts all changes to
// the state and to Ether balances. It is often
// a good idea to use this if functions are
// called incorrectly. But watch out, this
// will currently also consume all provided gas
// (this is planned to change in the future).
require(
(msg.sender == chairperson) &&
!voters[voter].voted &&
(voters[voter].weight == 0)
);
We try to always use the oldest version of Solidity that is still able to compile the code. Thanks for telling us about the outdated comment!
__This issue now has a funding of 0.16 ETH (60.86 USD @ $380.4/ETH) attached to it.__
__Work has been started on the 0.16 ETH (101.45 USD @ $634.05/ETH) funding by__:
__Please work together__ and coordinate delivery of the issue scope. Gitcoin doesn't know enough about everyones skillsets / free time to say who should work on what, but we trust that the community is smart and well-intentioned enough to work together. As a general rule; if you start work first, youll be at the top of the above list ^^, and should have 'dibs' as long as you follow through.
On the above list? Please leave a comment to let the funder (@vs77bb) and the other parties involved what you're working, with respect to this issue and your plans to resolve it. If you don't leave a comment, the funder may expire your submission at their discretion.
Hello, i'm going to work on this.
@netrunnerX are you still working on this issue?
@gitcoinbot it has been merged already.
@axic. :wave: thanks for the atMention, but you need to install @gitcoinbot on this repo for me to be able to respond. More details in the documentation.
:v:
@gitcoinbot
@netrunnerX are you still working on this issue?
So, what are the security implications of installing @gitcoinbot on this repo?
@chriseth. :wave: thanks for the atMention, but you need to install @gitcoinbot on this repo for me to be able to respond. More details in the documentation.
:v:
@gitcoinbot
@netrunnerX can you claim the bounty without us installing the app on the repo?
@chriseth I wish, the problem is that I must pay gas to submit work on Gitcoin and I have 0 eth 馃槄 . I have to find a way to buy some eth.
Hi @chriseth @netrunnerX sorry for the delay on our side here, and for Gitcoin Bot running wild. Sincerely apologize and will clean up Gitcoin Bot accordingly. cc @owocki
Yes, @netrunnerX can claim without you installing the app.
@netrunnerX - feel free to make a submission to the Gitcoin Faucet, which will distribute you enough ETH to submit work. From there, we will pay out for this bounty!
Hi @vs77bb ,
I'm trying to submit a request to Gitcoin Faucet, but it returns an error:
"The submitted github profile shows a pending faucet distribution."
The weird thing is that i haven't submitted a previous request. The only thing I did before was check the URL before going out of home.
Is there a way to see if I really have a pending distribution?
Thank you!
@netrunnerX Just DM'd you on Gitcoin slack for your MetaMask details. I'll send over to you soon!
__Work for 0.16 ETH (101.45 USD @ $634.05/ETH) has been submitted by__:
Submitters, please leave a comment to let the funder (@vs77bb) (and the other parties involved) that you've submitted you work. If you don't leave a comment, the funder may expire your submission at their discretion.
__The funding of 0.16 ETH (101.45 USD @ $634.05/ETH) attached to this issue has been approved & issued to @netrunnerX.__
Most helpful comment
@gitcoinbot it has been merged already.