Apparently, if someone blacklists a user using tpu-, and the feedback gets invalidated, the user is not removed from the blacklist.
This has caused false positives. Example: http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/34103819#34103819
IMO, the user should be removed from the blacklist in case the feedback is invalidated.
Ideally? Yeah, it should. In practice? This is like someone using k in chat by accident then switching feedback... which also doesn't remove the blacklist, which is why we have !!/rmblu.
@ArtOfCode- so could it be implemented? It seems like a good addition and will reduce some false positives.
Over the last 3 months, 77 posts have had invalidated tp feedback. There were 10 other posts from those users made before or after the post with invalidated feedback. 7 of those 10 were true positives, 1 NAA, and 2 false positives.
So I don't think there are sufficient numbers here to justify it it.
Caveats (all working in favor of this proposal):
Most helpful comment
Over the last 3 months, 77 posts have had invalidated tp feedback. There were 10 other posts from those users made before or after the post with invalidated feedback. 7 of those 10 were true positives, 1 NAA, and 2 false positives.
So I don't think there are sufficient numbers here to justify it it.
Caveats (all working in favor of this proposal):