Skript: [SUGGESTION] Private Functions
Description
Sometimes I use the same function name in different scripts, this causes functions to get messed up with 2 diff codes.
We should be able to do private function test(): that only registers for the current script.
Thanks.
AyhamAl-Ali
All 7 comments
maybe local function test():
andrei923
on 23 Jun 2019
Sounds super useful!
TheBentoBox
on 23 Jun 2019
I think even making functions local by default and adding 'global' functions might work. Or just namespaces for everything.
bensku
on 30 Jun 2019
I think even making functions local by default and adding 'global' functions might work. Or just namespaces for everything.
That would be even better and more useful.
AyhamAl-Ali
on 30 Jun 2019
@bensku please, absolutely do not make functions local by default. That's just shit-tons of unneccessary busy work to change for people that have lots of functions
jaylawl
on 23 Dec 2019
@bensku please, absolutely do not make functions local by default. That's just shit-tons of unneccessary busy work to change for people that have lots of functions
True, if functions will become local by default everyone will have to recode, I think global by default is better.
AyhamAl-Ali
on 24 Dec 2019
Yes, that would be a breaking change so that probably won't be happening.
Wealthyturtle
on 24 Dec 2019
Related issues
ghost
路
3Comments
Anoniempje1234
路
3Comments
Eryk1983S
路
3Comments
ghost
路
3Comments
wohahobg
路
3Comments
Most helpful comment
maybe
local function test():