If a contact sends you a message and instead of reading, you block them straight away, I would not expect them to receive a read notification in any case. What is worse: If you just "Archive" the conversation, the blocked sender sees the "read" check symbol, even though the message never got read.
Actual result: Alice sees a "read" notification for their message in the conversation with Bob
Expected result: Alice should not receive a read notification
I noticed this too. Are you sure that the other person actually gets a read receipt?
I thought (hoped) that Signal just doesn't show the conversation as having an unread message, because I archived it and didn't want to be notified...
But if you are right I would very much liked this to be fixed too.
(I'm sorry for my terrible English, trying my best lol)
I didn't know what the behavior was so I tried it out so yes I am sure.
It's correct that we mark as read when archiving in general, but we shouldn't be sending read receipts to blocked contacts. We'll fix it, thanks!
Thank you, very much appreciated. Should I open another issue about mark as read when archiving in general? I think get why it is this way, though I believe that shouldn't be the case.
Thank you!