I have:
[x] searched open and closed issues for duplicates
[x] read https://github.com/WhisperSystems/Signal-Android/wiki/Submitting-useful-bug-reports
Group member who has blocked you doesn't get your messages.
Actual result: A doesn't get group messages from B.
Expected result: A should still get group messages from B.
Android version: 7.1.1 / 7.1.1
Signal version: 3.29.6 / 3.30.3


Isn't that the very point of blocking?
I think everyone should get all messages in a group, I believe WhatsApp handles it this way, but I'm not quite sure.
If someone blocks you, you should be blocked, group or not.
Adding to what the others already said: This would make it trivial to circumvent blocks. Every time someone blocks you, you could just create a two-person group and continue messaging them.
I think it's weird if someone responses to nothing...
@haffenloher That's true, but wouldn't it be possible to check if one has blocked you before adding one to a group? If not, there has to be another way of preventing that case.
I think the correct way of handling this is like Facebook's Messenger. It shows a warning dialog that someone you blocked is in this group, and you can choose whether you'd like to see the messages in the group or leave the group.
I disagree. Blocking should be private. If they know you blocked them then they may try and find ways around it
I was talking about this scenario: When A blocks B, and anyone creates a group including the two of them, a warning message is shown ONLY to A. B can write freely to the group. (But of course, A won't get notifications for the group until he/she approved that he/she wants to really be in that group.)
GitHub Issue Cleanup:
See #7598 for more information.
Most helpful comment
Isn't that the very point of blocking?