Sig-release: Auto-generated release notes file has bugs

[jihoon-seo]

• Related issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/website/issues/27606

What happened:

Auto-generated release notes file (being served in here) has bugs.

What you expected to happen:

[As-is]

## Changelog since v1.20.0

# Release notes for v1.21.0-rc.0

[Documentation](https://docs.k8s.io/docs/home)

# Changelog since v1.20.0

## What's New (Major Themes)

### Deprecation of PodSecurityPolicy

[To-be]

## Changelog since v1.20.0

## What's New (Major Themes)

### Deprecation of PodSecurityPolicy

[As-is]

## Dependencies

### Added
...

### Changed
...

### Removed
...

## Dependencies <!-- Duplicate -->

### Added <!-- Duplicate -->
...

### Changed <!-- Duplicate -->
...

### Removed <!-- Duplicate -->
...

[To-be]

## Dependencies

### Added
...

### Changed
...

### Removed
...

[As-is]

## Downloads for v1.21.0

filename | sha512 hash
-------- | -----------

[To-be]

## Downloads for v1.21.0

### Source Code

filename | sha512 hash
-------- | -----------

How to see the bugs:

• Visit https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/release/notes/
• Visit https://github.com/kubernetes/website/blob/master/content/en/docs/setup/release/notes.md

Anything else we need to know?:

Environment:

• Cloud provider or hardware configuration:
• OS (e.g: cat /etc/os-release):
• Kernel (e.g. uname -a):
• Others:

[pmmalinov01]

That is interesting. I know about PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/100968 that should fix the current release notes and remove duplication and not needed items. Maybe, the kubernetes.io has not picked the fixed changelog?
/cc wilsonehusin

[jihoon-seo]

CC: @wilsonehusin

[wilsonehusin]

ouch i didn't realize this is happening in k/website too. thanks for bringing this up @jihoon-seo!

the fix should be pretty close to what @pmmalinov01 mentioned. if anyone would like to take it, you're welcome to. otherwise i will get to this sometime this weekend!

[wilsonehusin]

Maybe, the kubernetes.io has not picked the fixed changelog?

🤔 looks like k/website part was manually done by the docs team of release team, which makes sense that they picked up the one with bug because we didn't catch the k/k bug until a day after or so.

in other words, sending a PR to k/website is the right move now.

[wilsonehusin]

so I think this bug should go to k/release because the actual tool which generates these documents are in that repository.

@jihoon-seo would you be interested to contribute code as well? let me know and we can work on it together, I'm @wilsonehusin on Kubernetes Slack 😃

(of course @pmmalinov01 you're invited too)

[jihoon-seo]

I opened an issue https://github.com/kubernetes/release/issues/2012,
so I am going to close this issue.
Thank you @pmmalinov01 and @wilsonehusin !