Shardingsphere: [Vote] Change project name from Sharding-JDBC to Sharding-Sphere
Sharding by JDBC layer only is not enough for diversified scenario. For example: dev language excepted Java, entry for database command client or UI. Because of the reasons, we dev anther proxy solution, the name of Sharding-JDBC is not suitable any more.
Because of Sharding-JDBC is well-known at the past 2 years, we can not give up this intellectual property, so we want keep the key word Sharding as well, just move Sharding-JDBC, the new project Sharding-Proxy and Sharding-Sidecar(incubation now, for kubernetes env) in an ecosphere together, We call them as Sharding-Sphere.
The vote is for All Initial Committers:
@shardingjdbc/committers
@ma-xiao-guang-64
@CharlesMaster
@YunaiV
Voters can either respond "agree, yes, +1", "disagree, no, -1", or "abstain".
terrymanu
All 46 comments
agree, yes, +1
CharlesMaster
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
chidaodezhongsheng
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
tuohai666
on 2 May 2018
+1
terrymanu
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
maxiaoguang64
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
haocao
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
YunaiV
on 2 May 2018
FYI this vote will open in at least a week. Welcome any contributor, end user and interested people to express themselves.
wu-sheng
on 2 May 2018
agree,yes,+1
hanahmily
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
gaoyaqiu
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
qiankunshe
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
chenhaifeng2016
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
yikangfeng
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
low901028
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
sagkanon
on 2 May 2018
abstain
LaoWhites
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
duerlatter
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
tianbin1001
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
learndockering
on 2 May 2018
agree，yes， +1
nature9007
on 2 May 2018
agress , yes , +1
himalayaRange
on 2 May 2018
agree,yes,+1
gql374417967
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
oracle219
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
DongJigong
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
chinawind
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
yjmyzz
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
chengchenrui
on 2 May 2018
+1
chinacode
on 2 May 2018
agree，yes，+1
kiddyt00
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
kuangzuoqiang
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
lvxinrong
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
490205395
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
zongtanghu
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
gufengwyx8
on 2 May 2018
My +1 (binding)
wu-sheng
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
tristaZero
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
LingLiYuki
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
wangda
on 2 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
lipeng1234
on 3 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
zhuokun
on 3 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
cherrylzhao
on 4 May 2018
agree, yes, +1
orangeyts
on 4 May 2018
@terrymanu I think we should close this vote today.
FYI, remind you, @shardingjdbc/committers doesn't match organization in website http://shardingsphere.io/community/en/organization/
We should fix this.
wu-sheng
on 9 May 2018
@wu-sheng wu OK. Thank you for remind, I will update now.
terrymanu
on 9 May 2018
Thanks for every voter, the vote is success and close now.
We received 39 agree, 1 abstain and zero disagree, initial committers are all agreed.
We will begin procedure about rename.
Thank you very much.
terrymanu
on 9 May 2018
sharding作为整个品牌的名称，然后项目里面又有一些专门的角色叫做sharding，稍感觉有点那啥
重庆省 重庆市 重庆乡 的感觉
但这说起来就是后话了
wangdan0-0
on 12 May 2018
Related issues
Akigaze
·
7Comments
595431930
·
4Comments
beijixi
·
5Comments
Frodez
·
3Comments
sandynz
·
4Comments
Most helpful comment
agree, yes, +1