/area API
/area autoscale
/area build
/area monitoring
/area networking
/area test-and-release
KFServing would like to enable data scientists to refer to ML models in a consistent way across ML Inference Hosts (like TFServing and TensorRT) without requiring the build of a derived container.
See discussion and proposed design doc at: https://github.com/kubeflow/kfserving/issues/148
This requires KNative support for:
We believe that (2) above is a clean extension and does not violate the immutability principle laid out in issues like #2025
Not sure if area label is correct
@mattmoor
Issues go stale after 90 days of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30 days of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so by adding the comment /close.
Send feedback to Knative Productivity Slack channel or file an issue in knative/test-infra.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
This also needs a place to put the model, so some volume work would be needed.
cc @savitaashture @markusthoemmes who are looking at multi-container, as I've mentioned these things as related work a few times.
Issues go stale after 90 days of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30 days of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so by adding the comment /close.
Send feedback to Knative Productivity Slack channel or file an issue in knative/test-infra.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
Would be good to have PVCs or any similar possibility to access models/files. Building derived containers seems very cumbersome.
Any feedback if you're working on it?
The most related thing in-flight is support for multiple spec.template.spec.containers, but I see spec.template.spec.initContainers, and expanded volume support as related (e.g. as a medium for passing data between containers). (cc @savitaashture @markusthoemmes )
I think at this point it is mostly a question of bandwidth. I know @JRBANCEL mentioned this on our call Weds, so maybe he is interested in tackling volumes next?
cc @dprotaso
I know @JRBANCEL mentioned this on our call Weds, so maybe he is interested in tackling volumes next?
Definitely, as this has been asked quite a bit already. Let's finish the Downward API work first though馃殌 .
Issues go stale after 90 days of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30 days of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so by adding the comment /close.
Send feedback to Knative Productivity Slack channel or file an issue in knative/test-infra.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
@JRBANCEL Any interest in tackling this for 0.17?
so sounds like init-containers are in the works, or at least being looked at?
I think it still needs a driver, but it is something I'd love to see. 馃槆
Are there any news about this issue?
This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.
Most helpful comment
I think it still needs a driver, but it is something I'd love to see. 馃槆