Sendgrid-nodejs: SendAt - recipient timestamp = time email was scheduled VS time it gets sent

Created on 22 Oct 2016  路  14Comments  路  Source: sendgrid/sendgrid-nodejs

Not entirely sure whether this is by design or an error.

Issue Summary

When I send an email that is scheduled to be sent in the future, when it does get sent, the 'time received' on the recipient side is the date/time that the original scheduling event happened (as opposed to the time the email was actually sent).

Example scenario

In the app I am building, I wish to remind users about an upcoming appointment, e.g 1 hour prior to the appointment time.

  1. Appointment time is originally put in to the app, e.g. 2 days prior
  2. Reminder email is set to be sent 1 hour prior to event
  3. Email gets sent by Sendgrid at the specified time, but, when the recipient opens it, they see it as having been sent 2 days ago as opposed to the time they actually received it.

Just wondering if this is by design or something that can/will be fixed. If by design then I will need to do the scheduling on my end else my users are going to think that they missed their appointment due to the timestamp not adding up.

Thanks!

question support

Most helpful comment

@thinkingserious

馃槙Not to my knowledge no. What March are we referring to here? 2017 or 2018?

I can't really comment on this issue any more regardless - due to the bug, we ended up transitioning our email elsewhere and haven't had a reason to change again/retry Sendgrid.

All 14 comments

Hello @HemalR,

Could you please open up a ticket at https://support.sendgrid.com so this can get on our queue for resolution?

Thanks!

@HemalR Did you find a fix for this issue?

@SherifMedhat Nope! The closest workaround I got was to not schedule emails at all and just use a frequently firing cron job (not ideal by any means!).

I didn't get a response from the support ticket I raised and I found an older Github bug report referencing the exact same thing as well so I suspect this is not on their priority list to fix.

Anyway, this issue, Sendgrid has been solid to work with, so comes down to how critical you feel this is.

@HemalR This is very a weird behavior from SendGrid!!

@thinkingserious Are you going to fix this issue soon??

@HemalR,

Can you please send me your support ticket number? [email protected]

@SherifMedhat,

We are not best equipped to help with this issue, since it is not related to the SDK. Could you please open up a ticket with our support team? Thanks!

With Best Regards,

Elmer

Yup - Request #786653

Ticket lodged on October 28th. It's been marked on your internal Zendesk as 'solved' :S

Zendesk support.pdf

Thank you @HemalR,

I will follow up.

is this an actual issue? i rely on sendgrid a lot and will soon be using the scheduling "sendAt" feature and don't want to stumble on this bug if it hasn't been resolved @thinkingserious

@tetreault,

I don't think so. I doubled checked with our support team.

@HemalR,

It looks like one of our support members reached back out in March to follow up. Did you receive that email?

@thinkingserious

馃槙Not to my knowledge no. What March are we referring to here? 2017 or 2018?

I can't really comment on this issue any more regardless - due to the bug, we ended up transitioning our email elsewhere and haven't had a reason to change again/retry Sendgrid.

Thanks for the follow up @HemalR!

Please let me know if you run into any issues @tetreault.

@HemalR Can you tell me which email service did you transition to. Because, even i encountered this issue and would prefer an api that lets me schedule email with some analytics. Thanks in advance!

I'm using Postmark (and Mailjet in another related app) - but the scheduling is now all in-house (so I guess from the scheduling perspective, it isn't really relevant anymore)

I've just tested this and it seems to have been resolved.

image

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

thinkingserious picture thinkingserious  路  4Comments

prasoonjalan picture prasoonjalan  路  3Comments

egges picture egges  路  3Comments

Loriot-n picture Loriot-n  路  4Comments

murphman300 picture murphman300  路  4Comments