Scikit-image: Broken math formatting in documentation
ahojnnes
All 4 comments
My bad. I've "partly" fixed it, but can't get my LaTeX build to work correctly. If anyone can (a) checkout and install upstream/v0.13.1 (tag), and (b) try the build process as detailed here, perhaps you'll have better luck. If so, please upload!
In the future, we should consider moving to MathJAX. (upd @soupault : done in https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/2832)
In the nearer future, I'll submit a PR to update the release process to include checks for math formatting as well as gallery formatting (what I screwed up last time but actually checked this time). We probably also want to build the docs on a travis machine instead of the release manager's machine.
jni
on 29 Sep 2017
The dev docs are being built on Travis-CI already, so we just have to extend that to the release tags.
stefanv
on 2 Oct 2017
Fixed and uploaded.
stefanv
on 3 Oct 2017
Looks good. Thanks! I鈥檒l keep this open as a reminder to build the docs with Travis.
ahojnnes
on 3 Oct 2017
Related issues
John1231983
路
4Comments
tolandwehr
路
3Comments
sakvaua
路
4Comments
rathaROG
路
4Comments
m-albert
路
3Comments
Most helpful comment
My bad. I've "partly" fixed it, but can't get my LaTeX build to work correctly. If anyone can (a) checkout and install
upstream/v0.13.1(tag), and (b) try the build process as detailed here, perhaps you'll have better luck. If so, please upload!In the future, we should consider moving to MathJAX. (upd @soupault : done in https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/2832)
In the nearer future, I'll submit a PR to update the release process to include checks for math formatting as well as gallery formatting (what I screwed up last time but actually checked this time). We probably also want to build the docs on a travis machine instead of the release manager's machine.