Salt: [BUG] Debian 10 is wrongly detected as < 6 in debian_service module

Created on 11 Jun 2020  路  3Comments  路  Source: saltstack/salt

Description
When using Debian 10 without systemd then debian_service treats it like versions <6 instead as >= 6. Therefore it calls /etc/init.d/[service] instead of service [service]. With Debian 9 everythings works as expected.

Setup
For example run service state in Docker image where sysemd is not booted.

Steps to Reproduce the behavior
Run any command from module service in Debian docker image.

Service modules then tries to execute service commands using /etc/init.d/[service]

Expected behavior
Service modules command executed using `service [service]

Versions Report

Salt Version:
           Salt: 3000.3

Dependency Versions:
           cffi: Not Installed
       cherrypy: Not Installed
       dateutil: 2.7.3
      docker-py: Not Installed
          gitdb: Not Installed
      gitpython: Not Installed
         Jinja2: 2.10
        libgit2: Not Installed
       M2Crypto: Not Installed
           Mako: Not Installed
   msgpack-pure: Not Installed
 msgpack-python: 0.5.6
   mysql-python: Not Installed
      pycparser: Not Installed
       pycrypto: 2.6.1
   pycryptodome: Not Installed
         pygit2: Not Installed
         Python: 3.7.3 (default, Dec 20 2019, 18:57:59)
   python-gnupg: Not Installed
         PyYAML: 3.13
          PyZMQ: 17.1.2
          smmap: Not Installed
        timelib: Not Installed
        Tornado: 4.5.3
            ZMQ: 4.3.1

System Versions:
           dist: debian 10.4 
         locale: utf-8
        machine: x86_64
        release: 3.16.0-9-amd64
         system: Linux
        version: debian 10.4 

Additional context
Bug seems to be in _service_cmd where osmajor Debian version is comapred with "6" this results in string comparsion instead of numeric comparsion so "10" < "6" is true.

Bug Magnesium severity-high

Most helpful comment

All 3 comments

Oh interesting thanks for submitting @MartinMystikJonas that shouldn't be too bad to fix. 馃槃

Thank you @terminalmage!

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings