I consider there are any alternative for Actions.empty() in 2.x. What are you suggesting to use instead of?
__ -> {} ? Thx.
Yes.
Check out the Functions class.
@vanniktech Note that's internal.
How come that those functions are internal? Up until today I thought that those aren't.
I also want to know why it's internal. is it supposed to not be named internal?
Their purpose is to support the public API and behavior without requiring them to conform to public expectations.
Most helpful comment
Check out the Functions class.