A lot of the feedback on https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/feedback-on-important-traits-rustdoc-feature/12752 had better suggestions for the "important traits" feature.
Some options were:
My personal preference is for "notable traits" because "important" is a much stronger value judgement whereas "notable" basically means "we thought you should know this" which is exactly what the feature does.
Thoughts? @rust-lang/rustdoc
We should pick something and rename.
I don't have strong feelings here but I think "Notable traits" is the best proposition out of the three.
I agree 馃憤 , "featured traits" might be confused with cargo features and "key traits" has different connotations in my mind.
I'd be interested in doing this.
@rustbot claim
Most helpful comment
I don't have strong feelings here but I think "Notable traits" is the best proposition out of the three.