As announced in e-mail below, we need to check if our scripts are compatible.
Hello All,
We are pleased to announce Red Hat's Bugzilla 5 beta [1]! We鈥檙e inviting all of you to participate.
We encourage you to test your current scripts against this new version and take part in the beta discussions on the Fedora development list [2]. Partners and customers may also use their existing communications channels to share feedback or questions. We ask that you provide feedback or questions by Wednesday, May 17th.
Here is a short list of some of the changes in Bugzilla 5:
The official release date for Bugzilla 5 will be determined based on the beta feedback. We will communicate to you as the beta progresses.
For more information refer to:
https://beta-bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=whats-new.html
https://beta-bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=release-notes.html
https://beta-bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=faq.html
https://beta-bugzilla.redhat.com/docs/en/html/using/index.html
https://beta-bugzilla.redhat.com/docs/en/html/api/index.html
Cheers, the Red Hat Bugzilla team.
1: https://beta-bugzilla.redhat.com/
2: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel%40lists.fedoraproject.org/
Made some test by scanning robottelo with (BUGZILLA_URL = 'https://beta-bugzilla.redhat.com/xmlrpc.cgi) and had some NONE data for some bugs , investigated in the new beta site beta-bugzilla.redhat.com seems some bugs are missing there,
from the stable URL (BUGZILLA_URL = 'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/xmlrpc.cgi') they exists and working as usually
@ldjebran maybe during beta the database is not the full one.
@ldjebran the item 1 is the most interesting, we can do REST calls instead of RPC, so it will speed up things I guess.
Please feel free to re-open, if this still needs fixing.