Quarkus: Regression: Various YAML configuration issues in 1.6.1.Final

[famod]

Please allow me to skip the issue-template for this since it has already been taken care of in smallrye-config 1.8.5 which Quarkus should update to ASAP when that version is released.
See:

• https://quarkusio.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187030-users/topic/1.2E6.2E1.3A.20config.20yaml.20problems
• https://github.com/smallrye/smallrye-config/pull/360
• https://github.com/smallrye/smallrye-config/pull/361
• https://github.com/smallrye/smallrye-config/pull/362

C&P of two manifestion of those problems:

11:36:10,778 WARN  [io.qua.config] (Quarkus Main Thread) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.http.ssl.cipher-suites.[2]" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or you did not make a typo
11:36:10,778 WARN  [io.qua.config] (Quarkus Main Thread) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.http.ssl.cipher-suites.[1]" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or you did not make a typo
11:36:10,778 WARN  [io.qua.config] (Quarkus Main Thread) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.http.ssl.cipher-suites.[4]" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or you did not make a typo
11:36:10,778 WARN  [io.qua.config] (Quarkus Main Thread) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.http.ssl.cipher-suites.[3]" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or you did not make a typo
11:36:10,779 WARN  [io.qua.config] (Quarkus Main Thread) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.http.ssl.cipher-suites.[5]" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or you did not make a typo
11:36:10,779 WARN  [io.qua.config] (Quarkus Main Thread) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.http.ssl.protocols.[1]" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or you did not make a typo
11:36:10,779 WARN  [io.qua.config] (Quarkus Main Thread) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.http.ssl.protocols.[0]" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or you did not make a typo
11:36:10,779 WARN  [io.qua.config] (Quarkus Main Thread) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.log.category.liquibase.changelog.ChangeSet.level" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or you did not make a typo
11:36:10,779 WARN  [io.qua.config] (Quarkus Main Thread) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.log.category.com.somecompany.someproject.middleware.level" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or you did not make a typo
11:36:10,779 WARN  [io.qua.config] (Quarkus Main Thread) Unrecognized configuration key "quarkus.http.ssl.cipher-suites.[0]" was provided; it will be ignored; verify that the dependency extension for this configuration is set or you did not make a typo

Those .[x]-warnings are actually false negatives but the loglevel related warnings are correct.

Temporary Workaround:
Add this to your Maven dependencyManagement, _before_ quarkus-bom or quarkus-universe-bom:

<dependency>
    <groupId>io.smallrye.config</groupId>
    <artifactId>smallrye-config-source-yaml</artifactId>
    <version>1.8.1</version>
</dependency>

/cc @radcortez @geoand @gsmet

[geoand]

@radcortez are you planning on looking into this or should I?

[radcortez]

@geoand already did.

These issues are localised only in the YAML Config Source, so it is easy to workaround by downgrading to the last dependency like stated by @famod without affecting the configuration core.

All the reported issues are already fixed in SmallRye Config and just require a release and minor bump in the Quarkus dependency.

@famod Thank you for all the help and report!

[geoand]

Excellent, thanks @radcortez

[famod]

@famod Thank you for all the help and report!

You're welcome! We also have to thank @tkalmar for his support.
And thank you for reacting so quickly!

[wjglerum]

Thanks for reporting and finding the underlying issue, we were also encountering the same behaviour after upgrading to 1.6.1

The suggested workaround works here too, thanks!

[radcortez]

@famod @tkalmar @wjglerum did any of you find anything else? If not, I can push a release of SmallRye Config.

[famod]

@radcortez not on my side, but we updated just yesterday. I am not "at work" today so I don't know whether anything new popped up.
Since there is a workaround and @gsmet assigned it to 1.7.0 (and not flagged it with backport?), I personally could wait until next week or so.

[radcortez]

Ok :)

[gsmet]

Yeah, unless something critical with no workaround comes up, I won't do an 1.6.2.

[famod]

@radcortez I just realized that 1.7.0.CR1 is already slated for the day after tomorrow.

I guess it is not a showstopper if it misses CR1 (and lands in Final instead), but it would be great if you could manage to get the update of SmallRye Config into CR1.

[gsmet]

Note that I will be a bit nervous to upgrade SmallRye Config post CR1 so let's try to get this in before CR1 please.

[radcortez]

Yes, all the fixes are in. I just need to push the release and do the update. @famod you were able to confirm that the fixes, did indeed solve the problems, right?

[famod]

I just need to push the release and do the update. @famod you were able to confirm that the fixes, did indeed solve the problems, right?

Unfortunately I have not yet checked your fixes. Do you have a SNAPSHOT-release somewhere?
I would need to focus on the first two fixes since my team is not affected by the third one.

[radcortez]

Yes, I can push one to Central.

[radcortez]

Ok 1.8.5-SNAPSHOT should be available here: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/

[tkalmar]

@radcortez I can confirm, that this snapshot fixes the regressions. Excellent work.

[radcortez]

@tkalmar Thank you very much for checking. Ok pushing a stable release!

[wjglerum]

Can confirm that the snapshot release fixes the regressions indeed, thanks @radcortez!

[radcortez]

@wjglerum Thanks for checking :)

[famod]

Thanks all! This is how the community should work.

[radcortez]

Thanks all! This is how the community should work.

Indeed :)