-q, but this is a global option which affects many other parts (like diff and progress reporting).How about a --lean-terminal or something which only skips both header and summary?
A more concrete example:
位 python -m pytest src -ra
======================== test session starts ========================
platform win32 -- Python 3.6.8, pytest-5.3.2, py-1.8.1, pluggy-0.13.1
rootdir: C:\Users\bruno\hooksample
collected 1 item
src\pyi_hooksample\__pyinstaller\t\test_hooksample_packaging.py . [100%]
========================= warnings summary ==========================
src/pyi_hooksample/__pyinstaller/t/test_hooksample_packaging.py::test_pyi_hooksample
C:\Users\bruno\hooksample\.env36\lib\site-packages\PyInstaller\lib\modulegraph\util.py:4: DeprecationWarning: the imp module is deprecated in favour of importlib; see the module's documentation for alternative uses
import imp
-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/warnings.html
=================== 1 passed, 1 warning in 4.81s ====================
Becomes:
位 python -m pytest src -ra --lean-terminal
======================== test session starts ========================
collected 1 item
src\pyi_hooksample\__pyinstaller\t\test_hooksample_packaging.py . [100%]
=================== 1 passed, 1 warning in 4.81s ====================
How about a
--lean-terminalor something which only skips both header and summary?
What about --no-header, for something explicit?
The summary gets skipped by default (except for warnings being on there by default), but -rN (or -r-w etc) would skip it there then (#6454).
What about --no-header, for something explicit?
I'm using this suggestion in case we go for #6454 and the summary gets shown by default, but you are right that if -rN is a thing probably --no-header is better.
And I agree with you that it would be good to have a single option for it ("--lean-terminal"), but also think that it makes sense to have an option to skip the header by itself explicitly.
So instead of -rN we could also have --no-summary as a long option for clarity (but -rN would make sense still).
If we can find a good/better name for --lean-terminal that would then be a shortcut for --no-header --no-summary.
Agree. 馃憤
As both a user and a maintainer, it's occasionally but very very useful to be able to see what version of Python, pytest, and plugins are running. IMO it's not worth endangering this to save just two lines of space in the terminal!
@Zac-HD
Do you mean we should not have --no-header?
Otherwise I agree with the usefulness of the information, and thought that we should e.g. include the header (the version information) with e.g. something like --version -v.
That's correct, I'm a -.5 on this change because I find the header very useful in bug reports and don't think omitting it is very helpful.
I also have a general preference for less config options, because the more we add the harder it becomes to learn pytest or to write exhaustive self-tests and reliable plugins.
I find the header very useful in bug reports and don't think omitting it is very helpful.
Ok. Keep in mind though that it is not enabled by default (and users using it on purpose would be the same as not pasting the header then).
We might even allow for keeping crucial parts of the header with -q then maybe even (given that there is a way to skip it explicitly).
Ok. Keep in mind though that it is not enabled by default
Yeah that's important, I agree the header should be on by default.
Most helpful comment
That's correct, I'm a -.5 on this change because I find the header very useful in bug reports and don't think omitting it is very helpful.
I also have a general preference for less config options, because the more we add the harder it becomes to learn pytest or to write exhaustive self-tests and reliable plugins.