Feature Description
It could be great write private neural networks using the modern best practices implemented in FastAI. I tried PySyft 0.2 alongside with FastAI (v1) and they are not perfectly compatible each other. Do you think is possible make compatible the new PySyft 0.3 with FastAI v2?
rondey
All 8 comments
It totally could be possible. I know a few people from the FastAI Audio group who might be interested in helping. @rbracco ?
madhavajay
on 18 Dec 2020
@rondey I would also highly recommend posting this on the FastAI Discord / Forums as well and see if @jph00 is potentially interested in giving it some official sanctioning.
madhavajay
on 18 Dec 2020
@madhavajay Thank you so much, I have created a new post on the FastAI forum.
rondey
on 18 Dec 2020
Looking forward to seeing how you get along with this! :D
jph00
on 19 Dec 2020
@jph00 I'll consider that officially sanctioned 馃憤馃徏
@rondey I am a big FastAI fan myself but we don't have the bandwidth to start this right now while we are building support for all the other libraries needed to provide the PPML functionality you mentioned in the FastAI forum post. 馃槀. However if you are interested in opening an initial PR on this I can walk you through the process. 鉂わ笍
madhavajay
on 20 Dec 2020
I like the idea, but actually I have a paper to complete (I'm using PySyft for the implementation).
rondey
on 24 Dec 2020
@rondey No worries, I am sure we will get to very soon, but we just have a few priorities of our own as well. 馃槉 Good luck with the paper and thanks for using PySyft in the implementation. 鉂わ笍
madhavajay
on 29 Dec 2020
Thank you! I perfectly understand your priorities
rondey
on 31 Dec 2020
Related issues
tblazina
路
3Comments
robert-wagner
路
4Comments
MetaT1an
路
3Comments
wentaiwu92
路
4Comments
IonesioJunior
路
3Comments
Most helpful comment
Looking forward to seeing how you get along with this! :D