@iamtrask sir there are still many issues opened which have been solved and merged. This is thus causing a problem in finding non-implemented issues to fix.
@sajalsubodh22 Can you let me which issues you are talking about? I'll check them out.
Sorry about that @sajalsubodh22 !
dammit... keep accidentally hitting "Close and comment"... ironic... since this ticket is about my reluctance to close the right Issues
I don't know if this has been talked outside GH but these are some currently implemented-but-not-closed issues:
ping: @iamtrask & @siarez
Right now we are discussing whether we want to conform to PyTorch's conventions. And if not, come up with conventions of our own. In either case some of these functions will most likely have to be moved around.
Maybe we can defer closing them untill then, or we can close them now and open another issue which addresses the convention issue.
Closed. We should address the convention thoughts under the new ticket.
That way we keep the conversation focused in one spot (easier to follow)
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Sia Rezaei notifications@github.com
wrote:
Right now we are discussing whether we want to conform to PyTorch's
conventions. And if not come up with conventions of our own. In either case
some of these functions will most likely have to be moved around.
Maybe we can defer closing them untill then, or we can close them now open
another issue which addresses the convention issue.—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/OpenMined/PySyft/issues/241#issuecomment-332607454,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEIMkpalrFb4djHXk_EdNheInb9juaYEks5smo6ugaJpZM4PeKqa
.