Hello,
isort 5, a new major release which is very much improved, has just been released.
So far, it is not possible to install pylint and isort 5 together.
It would be great if pylint could add support for it :)
This is much needed! would love to see this sooner than later.
Excited to see #3725!
One concrete reason to support isort 5 is for compatibility with black. isort 4 and black conflict with each other slightly (https://github.com/timothycrosley/isort/issues/694), which makes it challenging to use black and isort 4 (or pylint, which depends on isort 4) together.
Right now in our code base, we have isort 5 and black installed, which keeps the formatting consistent, but have pylint disabled 馃槩.
I maintain both isort and pylint for Fedora, and will be happy to test any proposed fixes.
Hey @limburgher, it's seems as this issue has been fixed in #3725
So it has, thank you!
Is there a chance to add this issue to the closest milestone? this issue really important for my use case.
For Debian, it would be extremely important to get https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/pull/3725 merged and a new pylint release cut out soon: isort 5 was uploaded to our archive, so now pylint is getting removed from our users boxes because it conflicts with isort < 5
:(
(i tried to adapt the https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/pull/3725 changes to 2.5.3, but there are too many changes in between)
@sandrotosi I did the work, and attached to the Debian RC bug!
Any progress with this issue? I'm stuck in this situation where I need to choose between pylint and isort because of it.
I cannot use isort4 because of some bugs it causes in my CI/CD process.
For now, I chose pylint over isort because it points out a lot of important bugs and really elevates my code, but I really want to use both. I'm a true believer in clean code, and I try to keep my code as clean as possible. Please help me make that happen!
Most helpful comment
Is there a chance to add this issue to the closest milestone? this issue really important for my use case.