Namespaces support was added on #331, however the documentation for that features is missing in the README.
Yes, we definitely should document this. Do you want to send a PR?
Is this issue just waiting for a PR with passing tests, as it doesn't look like #410 is currently passing? If so, happy to do my part and get the documentation to reflect this (very helpful) behavior.
On closer inspection, it seems like the failures here were caused a random infrastructure blip. Can we trigger them to run again, @guzart? If more work is needed at that point, I'd be glad to work on it if need be.
Thanks @JenHomann, I've triggered a new build. Test are passing now.
It's worth mentioning that besides #410 there's also #392.
Note: I won't feel offended if #392 is merged 馃槈
Most helpful comment
Yes, we definitely should document this. Do you want to send a PR?