Proposal-pattern-matching: Champion update

Created on 1 Apr 2020  路  13Comments  路  Source: tc39/proposal-pattern-matching

As of today's TC39, I'm currently the champion of this proposal.

My plan is to spend the time between now and the next meeting to familiarize myself with the proposal, and do issue/PR housekeeping, and then to give a more substantive update at that meeting.

In a future meeting after that, I will attempt to seek stage 2, assuming committee feedback and the champion group are aligned.

At the moment, the following delegates have indicated interest in co-championing:

  • @tabatkins
  • @codehag
  • @mpcsh
  • @Jack-Works

and some have indicated interest in helping, without being a co-champion:

  • @devsnek
  • @rkirsling
  • @hax

Comment if you're a delegate and interested in helping! In the next week or three, I'll put together a champion group call with interested folks, and we can get on the same page about things.

Most helpful comment

@ljharb and @DanielRosenwasser and others working on this: I think this proposal requires some really hard work that a lot of people wanted done but that wasn't being actively worked on.

fwiw, I think it's really good for JS and the community that @zkat's research work isn't lost and that this area can be explored more. Thank you!

All 13 comments

I'd be interested in that champion group call too.

I'm interested in championing, but fair warning that I think the proposal needs to move in a different direction if you'd be open to discussion there.

@DanielRosenwasser let's chat about that directly then, first :-)

@ljharb and @DanielRosenwasser and others working on this: I think this proposal requires some really hard work that a lot of people wanted done but that wasn't being actively worked on.

fwiw, I think it's really good for JS and the community that @zkat's research work isn't lost and that this area can be explored more. Thank you!

I'm very happy we can restart the work on this proposal, though I have a big concern on the dev experience of current syntax.

I'm very happy we can restart the work on this proposal, though I have a big concern on the dev experience of current syntax.

reasonable to me, really should reconsider difference between value/expression match or "pattern" match

(coincidentally exactly three weeks later) did the group call get scheduled? is there anything I - or any of us - can do to help wrangle schedules, poke folks for responses?

No, it did not :-) i was planning to send it out last week, but layoffs intervened. I'll send out a doodle shortly.

I've sent out the doodle to those delegates that have expressed interest; if you didn't get it, or weren't included, please ping me (ideally on a chat medium, but here if necessary).

Is this an appropriate place to ask about status? Are there any blockers? Any way to contribute?

@texastoland theres no status update yet, and the proposal鈥檚 still pretty early, but there will be ways to contribute in the future :-)

Champions list in readme seems to be outdated.

The proposal has now been updated in #174.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

JLHwung picture JLHwung  路  3Comments

michaelficarra picture michaelficarra  路  8Comments

caub picture caub  路  8Comments

xtuc picture xtuc  路  4Comments

samuelgruetter picture samuelgruetter  路  3Comments