Most of the recommended search engines on the privacytools.io website are non-free.
Including StartPage, DuckDuckGo, and Qwant.
Despite there being several amazing free software search engines:
_Open issues/PR:_
_Closed issues/PR:_
_Accepted Issues/PR:_
Related to #699
Why is this the current status of the privacytools.io search engine section?
Please discuss! :)
While I like open source, I doubt how much actule difference this will make. How can we verify that the one hosting the search engine runs this code?
While I like open source, I doubt how much actule difference this will make. How can we verify that the one hosting the search engine runs this code?
LibreJS, it currently has limited support among search engines but many have made some progress to support it or have open issues.
Jive Search: https://github.com/jivesearch/jivesearch/issues/89
Yacy and Sarchy: https://github.com/yacy/yacy_search_server/pull/56
Gigablast (no response): https://github.com/gigablast/open-source-search-engine/issues/146
Most are also self-hostable like SearX which has an instance run by PrivacyTools.io and one ran by Disroot.
It should be noted that while we prefer open source applications in general, it is not a requirement to be listed. We list the best overall tools in each category because if they are privacy-respecting and people will use them, then they are better for most users.
Not that we can't discuss this issue, but "because they're not open source" can't be the only reason we remove tools. Open source alternatives need to either be significantly better, or the closed source ones we recommend need to have significant real-world or privacy-related drawbacks.
I use searx, but as long as they don't spy/have severe issues, I see no problem with keeping duckduckgo. Startpage and ixquick are different though, because I don't know much code they use that is actually freely licensed. That being said, duckduckgo isn't completely free either.
@JonahAragon To chime in a bit here.
How many reasons are needed to remove something? If not just one?
Cuz, we don't list VPNs in the United States and discourage utilization of US services.
Yet DuckDuckGo is US based and doesn't hide you searches at a local level.1
Plus services like Qwant reserve the right to change their ToS at any time.1
Privacytools.io also does not recommend centralized social networks on the premise it gives one entity to much power. However, non-free search engines are inherently not self-hostable.
While networks like SearX and JiveSearch promote healthy competition between hosts.
gigablast is dead - unmaintained for a long time, shitty code according to someone who tried to start a company based on it
yacy is an excellent idea i think (future is p2p search?), but at this time it's essentially useless as a search engine since it's index is so small
sarchy is a fork of yacy and i didn't see any public instances
searx is the best of the meta search engines IMO, but it relies largely on the commercial indexes (google, etc., though you can adjust that - supports yacy as well)
jive is another meta that uses yandex and pixabay and possibly other commercial indexes
so for the average user, yacy, sarchy and gigablast are poor alternatives in terms of comprehensive search results - jive i didn't test - searx is the best of the lot IMO
if anyone's interested, i keep a list of (hopefully) privacy-centric search engines...
Alternative Search Engines That Respect Your Privacy
@atomGit I'll have to disagree with you on Yacy.
However, 2+ free software search engines are more than enough.
SearX is great, however I prefer Jive Search's UI.
More sleek IMHO.
I used SearX for a long time. :)
maybe their index has gotten significantly bigger since i last checked - i'd like to test again, but the instance at yacy.snopyta.org is down - do you know of another instance? or, better yet, a list of instances? or perhaps you're running an installed version?