https://github.com/SpiderOak/Encryptr/issues/286
I don't think this should be featured on the site.
The last commit was in July 19, 2016 (https://github.com/SpiderOak/Encryptr/commits/master) and that was to update the README.md file. I checked the App Store (iOS) and last release was in Dec 19, 2015; Play Store in December 7, 2015. Looks like development for the password manager is secretly dropped. Probably a good note to remove software that isn't actively developed and not been given the silent treatment.
Same with some other Spider Oak tools.
I think there should be a threshold for activity, but also for how many developers contribute.
No one should be recommending a tool that only has 1 contributor, either.
As a note that shares some relevance to this issue, I don't think inactivity of development in itself is a reason to drop a project unless there are outstanding security issues. If a tool is secure as is and it works as expected, then I don't see an issue with discontinued development as long as there is a commitment to fixing upcoming security issues (which isn't the case in this example so the removal is okay imo).
Depends on the kind of tool.
Most helpful comment
The last commit was in July 19, 2016 (https://github.com/SpiderOak/Encryptr/commits/master) and that was to update the README.md file. I checked the App Store (iOS) and last release was in Dec 19, 2015; Play Store in December 7, 2015. Looks like development for the password manager is secretly dropped. Probably a good note to remove software that isn't actively developed and not been given the silent treatment.