For the larger context, see Our Error Handling, Ourselves - time to fully understand and properly document PowerShell's error handling.
The documentation (about_Preference_Variables and about_Throw) only makes the distinction between non-terminating and terminating errors, neglecting to distinguish between the two fundamentally different types of terminating errors:
Throw keyword or potentially by escalation via -ErrorAction or $ErrorActionPreference.The documentation mistakenly claims that $ErrorActionPreference exclusively applies to _non-terminating errors_, whereas it controls the behavior of both types of terminating errors too.
On a personal note, the conflation of the two types of terminating errors in the documentation has caused me years of confusion.
The sample cmdlet used below that generates a terminating error is courtesy of @PetSerAl.
# Define New-TerminatingError cmdlet whose sole purpose is to generate a
# statement-terminating error.
Add-Type '
using System.Management.Automation;
[Cmdlet("New", "TerminatingError")]
public class NewTerminatingErrorCmdlet : Cmdlet {
protected override void ProcessRecord() {
ThrowTerminatingError(new ErrorRecord(new System.Exception(), "Error", ErrorCategory.NotSpecified, null));
}
}' -PassThru | % Assembly | Import-Module
# Per the documentation, this should only affect *non-terminating* errors.
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'
# Should only terminate the statement (pipeline), not the script.
New-TerminatingError | % {} -End { 'end of pipeline' }
'end of script'
Note: Expected based on the current documentation - arguably, the actual behavior makes more sense.
New-TerminatingError : Exception of type 'System.Exception' was thrown.
...
end of script
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop' did take effect for the pipeline-terminating error and aborted the script:
New-TerminatingError : Exception of type 'System.Exception' was thrown.
...
# Per the documentation, this should only affect *non-terminating* errors.
$ErrorActionPreference = 'SilentlyContinue'
# Should abort the script, irrespective of the $ErrorActionPreference value, according
# to the documentation.
Throw "I'm outta here"
'end of script'
The script should be aborted, and the error message passed to Throw should be displayed.
I'm outta here
...
$ErrorActionPreference = 'SilentlyContinue' caused the Throw statement to be ignored.
Note that, according to the documentation, Ignore is an invalid value for $ErrorActionPreference and should only be used with the -ErrorAction common _parameter_.
However, it _is_ accepted and _somewhat_ takes effect: it ignores the Throw error, yet still records it in $Error.
end of script
PowerShell Core v6.0.0-beta.4 on macOS 10.12.5
PowerShell Core v6.0.0-beta.4 on Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
PowerShell Core v6.0.0-beta.4 on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (64-bit; v10.0.15063)
Windows PowerShell v5.1.15063.413 on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (64-bit; v10.0.15063)
Related comment https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/issues/2860#issuecomment-294914902
For posterity, my understanding of terminating errors was wrong. A terminating error cancels execution of the current pipeline or expression, not of an entire script block.
A better way to check for terminating errors is to just use try/catch:
C:\Program Files\PowerShell\6.0.0-alpha.18> try {"fdasf" | convertfrom-json} catch {1}
1
C:\Program Files\PowerShell\6.0.0-alpha.18> try {ls foo} catch {1}
ls : Cannot find path 'C:\Program Files\PowerShell\6.0.0-alpha.18\foo' because it does not exist.
At line:1 char:6
+ try {ls foo} catch {1}
+ ~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (C:\Program File....0-alpha.18\foo:String) [Get-ChildItem], ItemNotFound
Exception
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : PathNotFound,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.GetChildItemCommand
@mklement0 If we have this in docs repo I believe we could close the Issue.
@iSazonov: Sounds good. Longer-term, I wish we had a proposal to not just document the existing behavior properly, but to simplify error handling, which, needless to say, would be a major breaking change.
@mklement0 I guess the best way is to collect such proposals/specifications as RFC to implement them in next version (7.0?).
@mklement0 Do you have plans to draft such an RFC? If so, I'd like to follow its progress.
@alx9r:
No immediate plans, given the ongoing discussions, but I'll keep you posted (or vice versa, if you feel inclined to take it on).
I'd first like to better understand what the original design was (and where things went wrong) and if there's even a fundamental willingness to entertain the thought of a change by the powers that be - which would obviously a massively breaking change.