I'm reading the tutorial and it's interesting so far but I'm wondering if pony somehow duplicates what rust is proposing and also I saw some mentions to "go" on the documentation, can someone describe the distinctive characteristics of "pony" compared to other languages ?
It seems that the concepts described through the tutorial can be applied on any language except that the compiler/interpreter will not catch violations.
So far one strong attractive for me is the overall language/compiler size, although like anything else once created it will almost always grow in size/complexity.
Could "pony" also generate code for other languages ? I mean the compiler will do all the consistency/validations and through code generator generate code in other languages like C#, C/C++, JAVA, JAVASCRIPT, PYTHON, ...
Cheers !
Thank you. We eventually give a detailed comparison on ponylang.org.
@mingodad @sblessing
Some discussion about Pony comparing Rust.
http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/34rszb/pony_type_and_memory_safe_language/
+1, Benchmark would be appreciated between - ponylang, golang, rustlang - would love some other player like kotlin, dartlang and java too.
Interested in http benchmark
Most helpful comment
+1, Benchmark would be appreciated between - ponylang, golang, rustlang - would love some other player like kotlin, dartlang and java too.
Interested in
httpbenchmark