Could you add discussion of EIP-3171 to the agenda? I can present it. https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/3171
Would it be possible to finally get results of gas performance of EVM384? Even while BLS12-381 was postponed now it doesn鈥檛 cancel the fact that more crypto primitives are required
I assume it is widely understood that the protocols for the top layer should not be adequately encrypted by the transfer/network protocol. If Snappy is able to add to or not compress data, it does not matter if the upper layer is correctly encrypted.
...........................................................................................................
Regards https://fahadkhan.pk
@moodysalem @shamatar added :+1:
@moodysalem @shamatar added 馃憤
Have since found a good workaround thanks to discussion and don't think the EIP is worth presenting anymore
Can we add EIP-2937 to the agenda? @astarinmymind and I would like to present it. EIP-2937 // our PR on EIP-2937
@moodysalem removed, @technicallyty added!
Forgot to set a usual remainder: as was mentioned during last few calls EIP-2666 is ready, it was tested on existing clients, formulas are safe, etc. I would even expect that some clients may have got improvements since then.
Also, as secp256k1 now uses GLV multiplication with 30-40% speed boost, it may be good to later on reprice ECRecover
Closed in favor of https://github.com/ethereum/pm/issues/237