Environment
Description
I want to install a distribution that only has pre-releases. The legacy resolver does support this. The new one does not.
Note: using --pre
does not seem to influence the result. The legacy resolver could install such distributions without using --pre
.
Expected behavior
Installation should succeed.
How to Reproduce
$ pip install --no-deps odoo13-addon-date-range --unstable-feature=resolver
ERROR: Exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/me/pip/src/pip/_internal/cli/base_command.py", line 199, in _main
status = self.run(options, args)
File "/home/me/pip/src/pip/_internal/cli/req_command.py", line 185, in wrapper
return func(self, options, args)
File "/home/me/pip/src/pip/_internal/commands/install.py", line 333, in run
reqs, check_supported_wheels=not options.target_dir
File "/home/me/pip/src/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/resolver.py", line 80, in resolve
self._result = resolver.resolve(requirements)
File "/home/me/pip/src/pip/_vendor/resolvelib/resolvers.py", line 413, in resolve
state = resolution.resolve(requirements, max_rounds=max_rounds)
File "/home/me/pip/src/pip/_vendor/resolvelib/resolvers.py", line 310, in resolve
failure_causes = self._attempt_to_pin_criterion(name, criterion)
File "/home/me/pip/src/pip/_vendor/resolvelib/resolvers.py", line 240, in _attempt_to_pin_criterion
raise InconsistentCandidate(candidate, criterion)
pip._vendor.resolvelib.resolvers.InconsistentCandidate: Provided candidate LinkCandidate('https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/1f/0b/945335a37082b6b013cc1331f49e3f5b6a18cdd0b693475e6ca9e9a7df6e/odoo13_addon_date_range-13.0.1.0.1.dev8-py3-none-any.whl#sha256=3883bbe87db8d5db4364e8a42e86546e19e8e4f123d98c4e9454587dfa9401df (from https://pypi.org/simple/odoo13-addon-date-range/) (requires-python:>=3.5)') does not satisfy SpecifierRequirement('odoo13-addon-date-range')
Note I used --no-deps
because a dependency is not on pypi, but that has no influence on the result.
InconsistentCandidate
is raised if a match from find_matches()
does not return true for is_satisfied_by()
. So my guess is we need to fix is_satisfied_by()
to accept prereleases.
Nice catch @sbidoul! ^>^
I don't think this needs to be fixed right now prior to pip 20.1's beta, but yes, we do have to implement this eventually. :)
It would also fail with --pre
if the selected version is a prerelease. Not all prereleases fail though, only if the specifier does not contain a prerelease. I think I have a fix.