Pandoc: Is there a desired method for citing pandoc?

Created on 6 Mar 2017  Â·  5Comments  Â·  Source: jgm/pandoc

I am referencing the pandoc project in a journal publication I am contributing to. I would like to include a citation to more specifically direct people to the pandoc project. I looked through the documentation and about page but did not find a citation guide. Is there a preferred method for citing pandoc?

If not, I was thinking to use something like the following:

Pandoc Development Team (2016).  Pandoc: the swiss-army knife for converting files from one markup format into another.  
URL http://pandoc.org.

with a BibTeX entry for LaTeX users as:

@Manual{,
title = {Pandoc: the swiss-army knife for converting files from one markup format into another.},
author = {{Pandoc Development Team}},
year = {2016},
url = {http://pandoc.org},
}

Most helpful comment

I think pointing to pandoc.org in some way or another is
the best thing to do. For a title, you might use the
title on pandoc.org: "Pandoc: a universal document
converter." Of course, if you refer to a specific text,
such as the User's Guide, it would be good to cite that
directly.

+++ Steven C. Howell [Mar 06 17 07:21 ]:

I am referencing the pandoc project in a journal publication I am
contributing to. I would like to include a citation to more
specifically direct people to the pandoc project. I looked through the
[1]documentation and about page but did not find a citation guide. Is
there a preferred method for citing pandoc?

If not, I was thinking to use something like the following:
Pandoc Development Team (2016). Pandoc: the swiss-army knife for converting fil
es from one markup format into another.
URL http://pandoc.org.

with a BibTeX entry for LaTeX users as:
@Manual{,
title = {Pandoc: the swiss-army knife for converting files from one markup forma
t into another.},
author = {{Pandoc Development Team}},
year = {2016},
url = {http://pandoc.org},
}

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, [2]view it on GitHub, or [3]mute the
thread.

References

  1. http://pandoc.org/index.html
  2. https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/3490
  3. https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAL5Lq92yJYqAxVSSw6YvYarhPU7pelks5rjCR3gaJpZM4MUSNd

All 5 comments

Or we could just include the url in parenthesis, like this "...coverted to HTML using Pandoc (http://pandoc.org)."

@jgm: if you create an account at https://zenodo.org (login via GitHub) and connect the pandoc repository, each pandoc release will automatically get a DOI: https://guides.github.com/activities/citable-code/ Academics love DOIs.

I think pointing to pandoc.org in some way or another is
the best thing to do. For a title, you might use the
title on pandoc.org: "Pandoc: a universal document
converter." Of course, if you refer to a specific text,
such as the User's Guide, it would be good to cite that
directly.

+++ Steven C. Howell [Mar 06 17 07:21 ]:

I am referencing the pandoc project in a journal publication I am
contributing to. I would like to include a citation to more
specifically direct people to the pandoc project. I looked through the
[1]documentation and about page but did not find a citation guide. Is
there a preferred method for citing pandoc?

If not, I was thinking to use something like the following:
Pandoc Development Team (2016). Pandoc: the swiss-army knife for converting fil
es from one markup format into another.
URL http://pandoc.org.

with a BibTeX entry for LaTeX users as:
@Manual{,
title = {Pandoc: the swiss-army knife for converting files from one markup forma
t into another.},
author = {{Pandoc Development Team}},
year = {2016},
url = {http://pandoc.org},
}

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, [2]view it on GitHub, or [3]mute the
thread.

References

  1. http://pandoc.org/index.html
  2. https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/3490
  3. https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAL5Lq92yJYqAxVSSw6YvYarhPU7pelks5rjCR3gaJpZM4MUSNd

PS. Questions should go to pandoc-discuss rather than here. This is for bugs and enhancement requests.

I'll check out zenodo.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

dashed picture dashed  Â·  107Comments

matthijskooijman picture matthijskooijman  Â·  54Comments

nrnrnr picture nrnrnr  Â·  49Comments

phyllisstein picture phyllisstein  Â·  84Comments

anton-k picture anton-k  Â·  53Comments