P5.js-web-editor: chrome extension

Created on 10 Nov 2017  路  9Comments  路  Source: processing/p5.js-web-editor

Please could you make this editor a chrome extension

I don't know if this is possible and if I'm wasting your time but please could make this into a chrome extension as it would be impractical as a website?

feature

Most helpful comment

I'm going through and cleaning up old issues. I believe the way that would make sense to support offline support would be to use a service worker with local storage. (#813 / #103)

All 9 comments

thanks for the suggestion! i'm not sure i understand what you mean, as this project is currently a website. could you elaborate further, or include some simple wireframes?

My guess is that you are saying you'd like to be able to use this in chrome as an offline editor, without having do download a program to your computer. Then an extension would make sense.

Yes, that is what I meant.

i agree, that would be awesome! there's a few features i think are higher priority for now, but i've been getting a lot of requests for offline access so we'll see 馃槃

Thank You for listening to me.

I have some knowledge related to making a mozilla extension. I think if we're making an extension, it should probably be universal because mozilla does most of the stuff chrome API is able to do.

some more discussion about offline access over on the forum:

https://discourse.processing.org/t/p5-js-desktop-editor/9728/6

some discussion points that came up:

  • take the code from the current web-editor and compile it as an electron app so it would be a stand alone editor.
  • Another way to do this might be adding support for the Offline Web Applications API directly to the p5 web editor. http://apress.jensimmons.com/v5/pro-html5-programming/ch12.html
  • a build process to include a copy of the reference that is offline.

i think it would be better to support the offline web applications API鈥攁s we learned from the desktop editor, supporting different OS's with an electron app is difficult.

I'm going through and cleaning up old issues. I believe the way that would make sense to support offline support would be to use a service worker with local storage. (#813 / #103)

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

byfelipesanchez picture byfelipesanchez  路  4Comments

maartenwijntjes picture maartenwijntjes  路  3Comments

hellonearthis picture hellonearthis  路  4Comments

willingc picture willingc  路  5Comments

aferriss picture aferriss  路  4Comments