Org: Clean up inactive members - Jan 2021

Created on 24 Jan 2021  ·  17Comments  ·  Source: kubernetes/org

This is the list of inactive members that are slated to be removed from our Github Orgs. They have had no devstats recorded since July 1 2019.

Inactive Members:

  • @AishSundar
  • @SrinivasChilveri
  • @YouthLab
  • @alex-mohr
  • @amygdala
  • @austbot
  • @balajismaniam
  • @bryk
  • @chenopis
  • @chentao1596
  • @codevulture
  • @crimsonfaith91
  • @csbell
  • @csrwng
  • @dmatch01
  • @fabxc
  • @fanzhangio
  • @flyingcougar
  • @fraenkel
  • @gmarek
  • @gonzolino
  • @goruha
  • @grahamhayes
  • @hanjiayao
  • @hanxiaoshuai
  • @heckj
  • @hkaj
  • @ianchakeres
  • @ihoegen
  • @irabinovitch
  • @jagosan
  • @jianhuiz
  • @jimmycuadra
  • @jingax10
  • @jinzhejz
  • @kerneltime
  • @knobunc
  • @linyouchong
  • @madhusudancs
  • @magicwang-cn
  • @maisem
  • @mbohlool
  • @miaoyq
  • @mithrav
  • @mkjelland
  • @mrhillsman
  • @natekartchner
  • @nikhiljindal
  • @paulangton
  • @perotinus
  • @pskrzyns
  • @r2d4
  • @rsdcastro
  • @runcom
  • @sflxn
  • @syjabri
  • @thkoch2001
  • @venezia
  • @yissachar

Repos with inactive owners:

Kubernetes Org

Kubernetes SIGs Org

Kubernetes client Org

aregithub-membership help wanted

All 17 comments

+1 from me!

There is a limit on pings per post, this is the remainder that did not get pinged above:

  • @perotinus
  • @pskrzyns
  • @r2d4
  • @rsdcastro
  • @runcom
  • @sflxn
  • @syjabri
  • @thkoch2001
  • @venezia
  • @yissachar

@mrbobbytables 👋 Ola - yes, unfortunately inactive when it comes to Kubernetes. Not sure what you need from me or what this entails, but I thought I'd confirm at least myself for you.

No action needed, it was more an FYI ping 👍

/help
For cleaning up the owners files.
For previous examples of what the clean up PRs look like please see the previous cleanups:
https://github.com/kubernetes/org/issues/2013
https://github.com/kubernetes/org/issues/2076

@mrbobbytables:
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor.

Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here.

If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed
by commenting with the /remove-help command.

In response to this:

/help
For cleaning up the owners files.
For previous examples of what the clean up PRs look like please see the previous cleanups:
https://github.com/kubernetes/org/issues/2013
https://github.com/kubernetes/org/issues/2076

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Hey, I'm actually working my way back into the release team for 1.21. Can you please leave me in the org for now?

EDIT: @marpaia I just checked and it doesn't look like you're on the RT for 1.21. 😬
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/blob/master/releases/release-1.21/release-team.md
Are you getting involved in some other way?

Hi~ @mrbobbytables I'm planning keep working for the DOC-SIG team this new year. Can you please leave me in the org for now, too?

@YouthLab we prefer to move to remove and re-add when the person becomes active again. Things change rapidly in the project and 1.5years with no activity it's easy to lose track of things. I went ahead on adding @marpaia back because I thought they were a part of the release team and already involved (just not reflected on GitHub yet) - that is ON ME for saying yes before looking into it and have asked for more info.

The long term plan is to eventually automate this process (members being removed won't receive a ping). We updated our community membership guidelines outlining who is defined as inactive and how it is counted. For reference, we use devstats as our means to measure inactivity as it takes into account different types of GitHub actions, not just PRs or issues - but edits, comments and more. A general community notification about this policy was then sent to the k-dev mailing list.

We want to limit access to people that are consistently remain active. Org membership grants permissions to Kubernetes project repos and our CI system. If those privileges aren’t being actively used, we remove them to ensure we don’t have security issues down the road.

Not being a member doesn't mean you can't contribute. Many of our contributions come from non-org members. If you're ramping back up within the project, our org membership process has been streamlined. With a few PRs and two sponsors, we can add you back as a member.

@mrbobbytables That is ok. This is reasonable, better for the k8s org. And thank you for your reply with good intentions and patience.:)

-rest

Hi Bob,

Thanks for the heads up. Feel free to remove me, @chenopis, since I am no
longer working on Kubernetes.

Cheers,

--Andrew

Andrew Chen | Program Manager, Research Operations | [email protected] |
650-495-4987

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:08 AM Bob Killen notifications@github.com wrote:

This is the list of inactive members
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/community-membership.md#inactive-members
that are slated to be removed from our Github Orgs. They have had no
devstats recorded since July 1 2019.

Inactive Members:


Repos with inactive owners:
Kubernetes Org

Kubernetes SIGs Org

Kubernetes client Org


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/kubernetes/org/issues/2456, or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF5GHLMJYM6KDXLRV6ZOSRDS3VUL5ANCNFSM4WQWJPYQ
.

@mrbobbytables I would like to give this issue a shot, I read the comment on slack by @nikhita about updating the owners files. If yes do let me know if I can begin ?

@sladyn98 You can, just be sure to reference this post when creating PRs doing so. You can see some of the examples linked in #2013 and #2076.

I would also avoid opening PRs up in kubernetes/kubernetes to start as things are a bit more complicated with owners files there.

One other FYI - if the person being removed was an approver, they should be added as an emeritus_approver.

I opened some PRs for some of the files, I will continue creating pull requests once I know what I am doing is right :)

@sladyn98 They look good :) It might just take a little bit for them to get reviewed. 👍

All PRs to clean up OWNERS files have merged. Closing!

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

camilamacedo86 picture camilamacedo86  ·  3Comments

savitharaghunathan picture savitharaghunathan  ·  3Comments

dholbach picture dholbach  ·  3Comments

cblecker picture cblecker  ·  3Comments

Raffo picture Raffo  ·  3Comments