kubernetes/org
All (@kubernetes/owners)
While looking at https://github.com/kubernetes/org/pull/636, I noticed that the PR was already approved and merged, but by a non-SIG Release Chair/Lead.
I retroactively approved the PR, to make it clear that we're fine with the change, but I'd like to discuss a little. @timothysc was able to approve as he's part of Steering, which is listed as a root approver for k/org. I already chatted with Tim offline, and he said to definitely file an issue for this.
Do we want this?
As SIGs should be responsible for organizing themselves and Steering is really supposed to be an approver/denier of last resort, I think that we should either:
no_parent_owners: true in SIG OWNERS files/cc @kubernetes/steering-committee
/area github-management
/committee steering
I'm a pretty strong nope on no_parent_owners in this case, because the buck stops with the github admins here.
Removing steering from root instead
FWIW: whether membership into that team should be approvable by more than sig-release is orthogonal to steering being at root, that can definitely be represented in other ways, but I consider out of scope in this issue
SGTM on all points. Thanks for addressing, @spiffxp!
Closed via #638.
/close
@justaugustus: Closing this issue.
In response to this:
SGTM on all points. Thanks for addressing, @spiffxp!
Closed via #638.
/close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
Most helpful comment
I'm a pretty strong nope on
no_parent_ownersin this case, because the buck stops with the github admins here.Removing steering from root instead