Org: Repo Creation: k-sigs/metrics-scraper

Created on 10 Jan 2019  路  11Comments  路  Source: kubernetes/org

New Repo, Staging Repo, or migrate existing

New Repository

Requested name for new repository

dashboard-metrics-scraper

Which Organization should it reside

kubernetes-sigs

If not a staging repo, who should have admin access

@jeefy, @maciaszczykm, @floreks, @bryk

If not a staging repo, who should have write access

@jeefy, @maciaszczykm, @floreks, @bryk

If a new repo, who should be listed as approvers in OWNERS

@jeefy, @maciaszczykm, @floreks, @bryk

If a new repo, who should be listed in SECURITY_CONTACTS

@jeefy, @maciaszczykm, @floreks, @bryk

What should the repo description be

Container to scrape, store, and retrieve a window of time from the Metrics Server.

What SIG and subproject does this fall under in sigs.yaml

sig-ui

Approvals

(Under Jan 3rd)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PwHFvqiShLIq8ZpoXvE3dSUnOv1ts5BTtZ7aATuKd-E/edit#

Additional context for request

With heapster deprecated, this is a short-term (6-9mo) solution to provide metrics/sparklines to the dashboard by scraping the Metrics API and storing a window of data. The intent is, once this is in place, to build support/integration for other metrics providers (Prometheus to start) and phase this out. Ping me here (or in Slack) with any additional questions. :) Thanks!

aregithub-repo

All 11 comments

Can @danielromlein or @floreks approve for sig-ui?

We do need that for sure :slightly_smiling_face:

Repo is created. Direct permissions (admin/write) are still pending team creation.

Team access added

@jeefy Everything working as intended? If so, last step is to add to sigs.yaml

@cblecker Yep things look awesome.

I have a pending PR to update some SIG-UI stuff in sigs.yaml. Want I should add this into that PR? Or should it be kept separate?

Doesn鈥檛 matter to me. However you want to do it :)

Let's make fewer PRs. Added it into https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/3152 -- If I did something wrong with that lemme know. :)

@jeefy Looks like this can be closed now? :)

I think it can. Otherwise we can reopen 馃憤

/close

@maciaszczykm: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

I think it can. Otherwise we can reopen 馃憤

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

MorrisLaw picture MorrisLaw  路  3Comments

lpabon picture lpabon  路  3Comments

dholbach picture dholbach  路  3Comments

cblecker picture cblecker  路  3Comments

Pensu picture Pensu  路  3Comments