One of the edition dump field is named dewry_decimal_class. I think it should be dewey_decimal_class?
Good catch. The typo shows up in three languages:
https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=dewry_decimal_class&type=
@tabshaikh per slack discussions, assigning you to this easy issue. Feel free to unassign yourself and ping me.
@shivam-tripathi would you like to try to fix this one? It would be a PR of correcting the files @LeadSongDog listed above.
If this issue is still open, Can I start working on it? @mekarpeles
@kaushl2208 feel free to make a pull request if you have a fix
This seems to have drifted pretty far from the originally reported bug, which I interpret to be about ol_dump_editions_2020-01-31.txt.gz. @hornc fixed that (single record) problem with this edit: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7254013M/Centennial_remembrance_100_years--and_counting?_compare=Compare&b=18&a=17&m=diff
The three files that @LeadSongDog stumbled across are, as far as I know, unused and should probably be removed so as not to cause additional confusion.
I suspect that the typo existed, briefly, in the code base in 2011 when it both corrupted a record and got extracted into the i18n message files of the day.
I'll submit a PR to remove the obsolete files.
Most helpful comment
Good catch. The typo shows up in three languages:
https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=dewry_decimal_class&type=