Currently, there's some jck code in testJobTemplate.
if (GROUP == "jck" && JDK_IMPL == "openj9") {
EXTRA_OPTIONS = "-Xfuture"
if (JDK_VERSION != "8") {
EXTRA_OPTIONS += " --enable-preview"
}
if (ARCH_OS == "s390x_zos") {
// zOS has Attach API disabled by default
EXTRA_OPTIONS += " -Dcom.ibm.tools.attach.enable=yes"
}
}
This issue covers moving that into jck.mk, and any related changes.
As mentioned in https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-tests/pull/1753
📋 Step by Step
To solve this issue and contribute a fix you should check the following step-by-step list. A more detailed documentation of the workflow can be found here.
🤔❓ Questions
If you have any questions just ask us directly in this issue by adding a comment. You can join our community chat at Slack. Next to this you can find a general manual about open source contributions here.
Hi, can I know more details on this issue since I'd like to work on it. Thanks!
The requirement here is to move logic from a Jenkins groovy script, testJobTemplateL154-165 into the jck/jck.mk file.
This comment may be helpful, as it describes how the openjdk/openjdk.mk file was updated for something similar:
https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-tests/pull/1753#issuecomment-619077491
Hi @vanichitkara! Are you still interested in working on this issue? If not I'd take it. :)
Hi @ellschi! You can take up this issue since I have 2 more issues to work on at the moment
Great @vanichitkara, thank you for letting me know! @adamfarley, @smlambert Please assign me :)
Ready for review!
@ellschi - Heya. Are you asking someone to review a Pull Request?
If so, please add them as reviewers in the Pull Request and paste a PR link in this issue.
@adamfarley - not sure that new contributors have the ability to add reviewers and brand new contributors would not know who to add as reviewers. Rest assured as the core-team in Ottawa start their day, they know to assist in reviewing the PR backlog of this repo.
@ellschi - I do not see a PR from you, if you have changes in a branch, please create a PR so we can review, thanks!
@smlambert: Thank you for the feedback! I created this PR and now am unsure if this was the right way to do it...
Most helpful comment
Hi @ellschi! You can take up this issue since I have 2 more issues to work on at the moment