Not sure if it's related, but I asked a similar question in google-group before.
@stevegreatrex yes, that's correct. The tooling has not caught up yet to support those but that work is in-progress.
I'm trying to update the swashbuckle library to reflect this - could you give me an idea of how you would expect that situation to come out in the final JSON?
A nested array could look like the following:
{
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "integer",
"format": "int64"
}
}
}
to represent [[1,2,3]]
Perfect, thanks!
YAML
type: array
minItems: 2
maxItems: 2
items:
type: array
items:
type: string
Most helpful comment
YAML