Official-images: False positive vulnerability check CVE-2016-10109

Created on 11 Apr 2017  路  4Comments  路  Source: docker-library/official-images

Not sure if this is the right place to file the issue.
The vulnerability check for the crate image shows a false positive for CVE-2016-10109, see https://hub.docker.com/r/library/crate/tags/1.0.6/
CVE-2016-10109 was already fixed in alpine 3.2.4, crate users alpine 3.4 as base image. pcsc-lite 1.8.20 is not effected by the vulnerability, however it is shown as major severity.
screen shot 2017-04-11 at 09 37 00

Most helpful comment

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We checked with our alpine maintainer contacts, and this indeed looks like a false positive.
We'll work on fixing this, give us a few days.

@Moghedrin is right - it may be faster to open a support case, or just go through Provide Feedback link on the scan page itself, it'll send us a direct email.
Meanwhile, thanks for letting us know and we'll work on cleaning up the false positives.

@andreif - nginx is a different story, it has significantly more/different vulnerabilities in non-base layers. feel free to open a separate case for that if you believe they are false positives.

All 4 comments

Is this also related to Nginx images being all 馃敶 ?

This is fine for now, but it looks like they prefer you to open an issue through the Docker support website, based on what I could find.

I'm going to CC @toli in here, and leave it to him.

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We checked with our alpine maintainer contacts, and this indeed looks like a false positive.
We'll work on fixing this, give us a few days.

@Moghedrin is right - it may be faster to open a support case, or just go through Provide Feedback link on the scan page itself, it'll send us a direct email.
Meanwhile, thanks for letting us know and we'll work on cleaning up the false positives.

@andreif - nginx is a different story, it has significantly more/different vulnerabilities in non-base layers. feel free to open a separate case for that if you believe they are false positives.

Thanks @toli! 鉂わ笍

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings