Officedocs-deployoffice: BrowserModifier Malware Classification

Created on 25 Jan 2020  Â·  6Comments  Â·  Source: MicrosoftDocs/OfficeDocs-DeployOffice

This behaviour would constitute Malware/Adware of the BrowserModifier variety.

This is emphasized by Microsoft's own security documentation.

You must be able to start, stop, or otherwise revoke authorization given to software. Software should obtain your consent before installing, and it must provide a clear and straightforward way for you to install, uninstall, or disable it.

This browser behaviour should, if implemented at all, be explicitly presented as an option (i.e. checkbox) during the Office 365 installation / update procedure.

To not do so would not only go against Microsoft's own Malware guidelines, but could also trigger a response by security protocols implemented by either Google, or by third-party anti-malware tools.


Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

Microsoft Search in Bing

Most helpful comment

Seems like internal MSFT for sure, particularly given these references to MS-Internal and MSFT's "dogfood" site (an internal dev testing resource for MSFT employees):

https://gitmemory.com/ItzLevvie/dogfood-msinternal

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:aXPcvorGtUgJ:https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ItzLevvie/Office16/master/defconfig+&cd=21&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari

All 6 comments

@itzLevvie downvote? why? This is the truth, and no one in their right mind would think that what Microsoft is doing is any thing other than a browser hijack, also everyone knows that is a bad thing!

@ItzLevvie has been consistently downvoting any negative feedback with troll-like persistence. The user clearly has no concept of security, and should be ignored; particularly in the absence of any actual justification for downvoting.

@Thor-HoG indeed, seems to be a troll, he did downvote everything at first, then removed the downvotes, and now started again, and are also responding to PRs etc, which raised the possibility of being an MS employee. And if that is the case I would like to know ;)

Seems like internal MSFT for sure, particularly given these references to MS-Internal and MSFT's "dogfood" site (an internal dev testing resource for MSFT employees):

https://gitmemory.com/ItzLevvie/dogfood-msinternal

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:aXPcvorGtUgJ:https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ItzLevvie/Office16/master/defconfig+&cd=21&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari

And he has a Twitter that does an awful lot of retweeting Microsoft posts... 😃 Definitely someone internal or close to MS.

If they keep doing this, maybe we can report them according to Microsoft's Open Source Code of Conduct? I know some of the issues filed in this repo go against it too for being trolling, but I think their conduct also clearly goes against the "Understand differences" point here. That is, automatically downvoting people critical of MSFT instead of trying to discuss in issues like this one where people are actually trying to be constructively critical in explaining why this is a bad idea. Normally someone doing this isn't a big deal, but it becomes one since Microsoft owns Github now this reeks of them abusing this ownership and shutting down legitimate community discussion.

https://opensource.microsoft.com/codeofconduct/

EDIT: Thanks again for your downvotes @ItzLevvie, I'm reporting you to your own employer (and/or object of fanboy worship). Get off of GitHub if you don't want feedback to your work and are just here to make Microsoft look better with superficial open source "participation". You clearly don't have the emotional maturity to engage with open source communities or have civil conversations about the impact of your work so this is not the place for you.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

Dschrepfer picture Dschrepfer  Â·  3Comments

tinfever picture tinfever  Â·  3Comments

AsaIt32 picture AsaIt32  Â·  4Comments

EG-AASI picture EG-AASI  Â·  4Comments

bmansf picture bmansf  Â·  4Comments