To officially support nx generate @nrwl/workspace:library --name pubtest --publishable
The idea is to publish a framework-less library
> nx generate @nrwl/workspace:library --name pubtest --publishable
Could not match option 'publishable' to the @nrwl/workspace:library schema.
> NX Report complete - copy this into the issue template
@nrwl/angular : 9.0.4
@nrwl/cli : 9.0.4
@nrwl/cypress : 9.0.4
@nrwl/eslint-plugin-nx : 9.0.4
@nrwl/express : Not Found
@nrwl/jest : 9.0.4
@nrwl/linter : Not Found
@nrwl/nest : Not Found
@nrwl/next : Not Found
@nrwl/node : Not Found
@nrwl/react : Not Found
@nrwl/schematics : Not Found
@nrwl/tao : 9.0.4
@nrwl/web : Not Found
@nrwl/workspace : 9.0.4
typescript : 3.7.5
you can do that with @nrwl/node:lib (but yeah, it should be available in the core schematic -> which is workspace)
Ah thanks for the tip. I can look at what @nrwl/node:lib generates and copy the relevant parts
When building with @nrwl/node:package I've noticed that I don't get these dist folders

Is that intentional?
We cannot really make @nrwl/workpace:lib publishable because we need to know how to build it. That's why it has to be node, or react, or angular.
@snebjorn we don't bundle node libs. Any particular reason you want it to be bundled?
We cannot really make
@nrwl/workpace:libpublishable because we need to know how to build it. That's why it has to be node, or react, or angular.
I see. I just figured a @nrwl/workpace:lib would always be published as an NPM package. And had assumed that a @nrwl/node:lib was a lib meant to be run on node like express
@snebjorn we don't bundle node libs. Any particular reason you want it to be bundled?
No particular reason. I just thought it would be good form to publish JS in a standardized module format. The tree-shakeability of ESM seems like a good ability to have.
Yeah what @vsavkin said 馃憣. I guess good solution would be to have lib schematic for web and thus make it publishable.
there already is a web builder https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/packages/web/builders.json#L9-L13
There might be some issues as creating bundles for web-components is not trivial task... but as I said there is already builder for that 馃
can this be closed @snebjorn ? thanks
Most helpful comment
Yeah what @vsavkin said 馃憣. I guess good solution would be to have
libschematic forweband thus make it publishable.There might be some issues as creating bundles for web-components is not trivial task... but as I said there is already builder for that 馃