Node: util: spec of %d specifier

[shisama]

Due to a comment from https://github.com/whatwg/console/issues/148#issuecomment-411821759 , does %d specifier have better use parseInt? On Node.js, Number constructor is used for %d. So console.log('%d', false) prints 0 on Node.js but it prints 'NaN` on Google Chrome.
Is it okay if the specification is different from whatwg?

Code: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/lib/util.js#L294
whatwg spec: https://console.spec.whatwg.org/#formatting-specifiers

[lovinglyy]

Also, in node, by using Number, decimal places differ from Google Chrome too.
Google Chrome:
console.log('%i', 15.1) // outputs 15
console.log('%d', 15.1) // outputs 15
Node.js:
console.log('%i', 15.1) // outputs 15
console.log('%d', 15.1) // outputs 15.1

It is a contradictory behavior imo.

[Trott]

/ping @silverwind

[Fishrock123]

I'd rather keep the minor difference (which the Node.js ecosystem is probably used to) rather than loose functionality.

[silverwind]

I think we should take the breaking change and be spec-conformant. Formatting specifiers should be a rarely used feature and I guess most people would use template strings nowadays to interpolate data in strings. Any opinions from @nodejs/tsc?

[devsnek]

as long as our console claims to be the whatwg console we should make sure it follows spec. +1 from me

[shisama]

Hi 👋 Thank you for your commens.
I have been waiting for some days. However, there seems to be no opinion in half a month.
I want to fix this issue. Can I implement this and create Pull Request?
Please add 👍 if you agree.

[Trott]

PR is blocked and discussion seems to have run its course. Choices at this point are to close (and optionally pursue a spec change) or escalate to TSC. Thoughts? /ping @shisama

[shisama]

@Trott Sorry for my late reply. I closed the PR. Also, I close this. Thank you.