Nixpkgs: Emby license change, now proprietary

Created on 10 Dec 2018  路  4Comments  路  Source: NixOS/nixpkgs

It seems that the Emby server has changed license from GPL-2 to "proprietary core with open-source components":

https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby/issues/3479#issuecomment-444985456

As such, it seems that the sources for the 3.6 version and onward won't be distributed. I'm not sure what needs to be done here, but since I haven't seen a discussion about it yet, I'm opening a new issue.

Thanks!

Most helpful comment

Jellyfin seems to gain traction, maybe we could package it ?
After a few try it will not be trivial to package it as it is a dotnet core app and there seems to be no generic builder for that purpose.

This might be useful: https://blog.lextudio.com/offline-publishing-asp-net-core-apps-cf22f45158af
There still need a way to fetch package from Nuget in a local repo

And Emby 4 is out which is closed source now

All 4 comments

Here is a discussion about Emby forks and alternatives:

https://github.com/nvllsvm/emby-unlocked/issues/28

And here is what looks to me as an active fork (but don't quote me on that):

https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin

Emby wasn't built from sources in nixpkgs anyway. So I think the first step would be to change the license to unfree with the 3.6 update.

If a fork gains traction I think it makes sense to package it.

Jellyfin seems to gain traction, maybe we could package it ?
After a few try it will not be trivial to package it as it is a dotnet core app and there seems to be no generic builder for that purpose.

This might be useful: https://blog.lextudio.com/offline-publishing-asp-net-core-apps-cf22f45158af
There still need a way to fetch package from Nuget in a local repo

And Emby 4 is out which is closed source now

Now that Jellyfin is packaged and has a module, I think it's safe to close this issue ^^

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

langston-barrett picture langston-barrett  路  3Comments

sid-kap picture sid-kap  路  3Comments

copumpkin picture copumpkin  路  3Comments

grahamc picture grahamc  路  3Comments

lverns picture lverns  路  3Comments