Nixpkgs: Vulnerability roundup 51: openjpeg-2.3.0
All 4 comments
There is not a fix yet.
Could we tag it with a tag such as need: upstream fix ?
nlewo
on 6 Nov 2018
I would appreciate this, but I'm unfortunately unable to set labels here on GH. Perhaps it's time for someone™ to grant me necessary permissions...
ckauhaus
on 6 Nov 2018
@domenkozar @rbvermaa I think it is a good idea to give @ckauhaus write access
On a more local note, I created «9.needs: upstream fix», but I guess in this case we are not going to try and influence the upstream, so «2.status: wait-for-upstream» fits better. It feels like «9.needs: upstream fix» fits when we actively negotiate with upstream or prepare a patch to propose or something like that.
7c6f434c
on 6 Nov 2018
👍3
obsolete: 19.03 ships openjpeg-2.3.1
ckauhaus
on 27 Oct 2019
Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings
Related issues
ttuegel
·
98Comments
danykey
·
64Comments
timokau
·
66Comments
globin
·
65Comments
nh2
·
76Comments
Most helpful comment
@domenkozar @rbvermaa I think it is a good idea to give @ckauhaus write access
On a more local note, I created «9.needs: upstream fix», but I guess in this case we are not going to try and influence the upstream, so «2.status: wait-for-upstream» fits better. It feels like «9.needs: upstream fix» fits when we actively negotiate with upstream or prepare a patch to propose or something like that.