Just thought you guys would be interested into this benchmark of Neo4j versus Dgraph: https://open.dgraph.io/post/benchmark-neo4j/
- Dgraph is 160x faster than Neo4j for loading graph data.
- Dgraph consumes 5x lesser memory compared to Neo4j and is at least 3x faster for intertwined reads and writes.
- For intertwined reads and writes, Dgraph is at least 3x to 6x faster..
What do you guys think?
L
lazharichir
>All comments
I think vendor benchmarks aren't worth the paper they're written on. This one doesn't even distinguish between caching results (neo4j doesn't) and query plans (it certainly does). Their setup of neo4j is (deliberately?) naive too. On the whole, my position is that they need to prove themselves in the marketplace and not on their blog.
jimwebber
on 24 Jan 2017
👍4
Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings
Related issues
freeeve
路
4Comments
sgehrig
路
4Comments
BrainAnnex
路
4Comments
LWprogramming
路
4Comments
mammadalipour
路
3Comments
Most helpful comment
I think vendor benchmarks aren't worth the paper they're written on. This one doesn't even distinguish between caching results (neo4j doesn't) and query plans (it certainly does). Their setup of neo4j is (deliberately?) naive too. On the whole, my position is that they need to prove themselves in the marketplace and not on their blog.