Having just added Allied Pharmacies, I noticed the two tags with the value "_pharmacy_".
I understand a while back the "_healthcare=*_" tag was introduced, and part of that was "_healthcare=pharmacy_" which is currently included as a tag for any pharmacy within the NSI. #57
However, I've just noticed on the Healthcare Wiki that "_healthcare=pharmacy_" is crossed out as having been rejected as a tag, so should this be removed from the NSI, leaving just "_amenity=pharmacy_" as the primary tag, or is it still there for compatibility reasons?
Yeah I did see that.. That edit on the wiki was made by one guy who doesn't like any of the healthcare tags, but they singled out the one tag that wasn't listed in the proposal specifically. I'm not sure what to do about it.
At the time, we tried to support all the tags that the healthcare proposal included. This included dual-tagging (not deprecating) the existing amenity tags: amenity=hospital. clinic, doctors, dentist. I think most people would agree that pharmacy belongs in this list too, even though it was left out of the proposal. (It was left out because the original proposal wanted to replace it with shop=*, which nobody wanted).
Again, the proposal originally wanted to _deprecate_ all these tags, instead the iD team took the middle ground of just adding a healthcare tag alongside the existing established amenity tag. This approach doesn't break anything, but gives consumers the option to use the new healthcare tags if they want to.
I'm happy to discuss this rationally with people, but we can't do that if people just get mad and change the wiki after a decision has been made, or spin it like "iD invented a tag". People asked for healthcare=* tags and we tried to do our best to add them.
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/4329
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/7300
I know lately @ZeLonewolf has been doing a lot of work to understand these old tagging inconsistencies, and has been really good at hearing the stories of how things ended up the way they did, and pushing back on some of the rhetoric that people post to the tagging list or the wiki. Maybe this is another tag he'd be interested in cleaning up with a proper proposal?
Fascinating case! Throw it on the pile...
I'm going to close this for now because the dual-tagging of healthcare seems fine. We can change it later if OSM changes.
Most helpful comment
Yeah I did see that.. That edit on the wiki was made by one guy who doesn't like any of the healthcare tags, but they singled out the one tag that wasn't listed in the proposal specifically. I'm not sure what to do about it.
At the time, we tried to support all the tags that the healthcare proposal included. This included dual-tagging (not deprecating) the existing amenity tags:
amenity=hospital.clinic,doctors,dentist. I think most people would agree thatpharmacybelongs in this list too, even though it was left out of the proposal. (It was left out because the original proposal wanted to replace it withshop=*, which nobody wanted).Again, the proposal originally wanted to _deprecate_ all these tags, instead the iD team took the middle ground of just adding a
healthcaretag alongside the existing establishedamenitytag. This approach doesn't break anything, but gives consumers the option to use the newhealthcaretags if they want to.I'm happy to discuss this rationally with people, but we can't do that if people just get mad and change the wiki after a decision has been made, or spin it like "iD invented a tag". People asked for
healthcare=*tags and we tried to do our best to add them.https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/4329
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/7300
I know lately @ZeLonewolf has been doing a lot of work to understand these old tagging inconsistencies, and has been really good at hearing the stories of how things ended up the way they did, and pushing back on some of the rhetoric that people post to the tagging list or the wiki. Maybe this is another tag he'd be interested in cleaning up with a proper proposal?