Please answer the following questions for yourself before submitting an issue.
After some time of operation, there are AMQP queues in the system which have:
MOL.REQ.abcdefThe queues that caused me to investigate this issue had thousands of messages in them. Overall, there were hundreds of queues that no longer seemed to serve any purpose.
Queues that no longer serve a purpose are purged from the system automatically.
I checked the following issues for relation:
I have enabled autoDeleteQueues, but that doesn't seem to have any effect on the queues in question. After reading https://github.com/moleculerjs/moleculer/pull/341, I assumed this is by design.
Seems to require no specific interaction beyond starting/stopping processes.
Please provide any relevant information about your setup. This is important in case the issue is not reproducible except for under certain conditions.
@Nathan-Schwartz can you take a look at this?
I initially observed this in our test environment and today looked into it locally. When I start up the current state of the application on a fresh install of RabbitMQ and then shut everything down moments later, I am left with several queues:

It is my understanding that some of these queues are to be expected to exist, but the EVENT, REQ and RES queues should be node-specific unless I'm mistaken. So these will just pile up over time.
This seems to have been a configuration error on my part. Instead of providing the transporter options, I provided option 馃槖
After _properly_ setting autoDeleteQueues, the queues in question are now also clearly marked as expiring.

I find it somewhat confusing that this feature isn't enabled by default. Is there any benefit to keeping these queues around? It seems to me like they are very hard to salvage and ultimately produce more clutter and load than what they're worth.
Ahh, sorry you had to deal with that.
It defaults to being disable for backwards compatibility reasons, but it could be changed. For more context you can check out the discussion on this topic midway through this thread.
@Nathan-Schwartz Yeah, I read that. But, given the note about breaking changes possibly happening all the time in the 0.x versions, I'd like to suggest maybe making that change. It can be frustrating when you're onboarding and then you have to clean up a lot of dead queues.
Works great now though. Cheers :)
If you @oliversalzburg & @Nathan-Schwartz confirm that we will change it. we could do that before stable 0.14, So open a PR with the changes in the next branch, if you think.
Most helpful comment
@Nathan-Schwartz can you take a look at this?