Metasploit-framework: Error while running command jobs: undefined method `ctx' for nil:NilClass

Created on 16 Sep 2018  路  3Comments  路  Source: rapid7/metasploit-framework

Error while running command jobs: undefined method `ctx' for nil:NilClass when trying to kill a non-existent job.

Stack traces are ugly. Also, killing a job with a non-integer job ID defaults to killing job zero, which may or may not be expected behavior.

msf5 > jobs

Jobs
====

  Id  Name                    Payload                        Payload opts
  --  ----                    -------                        ------------
  0   Exploit: multi/handler  solaris/x86/shell_reverse_tcp  tcp://172.16.191.196:1337

msf5 > jobs -k 2
[*] Stopping the following job(s): 2
[-] Error while running command jobs: undefined method `ctx' for nil:NilClass

Call stack:
/pentest/exploit/metasploit-framework/lib/msf/ui/console/command_dispatcher/jobs.rb:213:in `block in cmd_jobs'
/pentest/exploit/metasploit-framework/lib/msf/ui/console/command_dispatcher/jobs.rb:212:in `each'
/pentest/exploit/metasploit-framework/lib/msf/ui/console/command_dispatcher/jobs.rb:212:in `cmd_jobs'
/pentest/exploit/metasploit-framework/lib/rex/ui/text/dispatcher_shell.rb:491:in `run_command'
/pentest/exploit/metasploit-framework/lib/rex/ui/text/dispatcher_shell.rb:453:in `block in run_single'
/pentest/exploit/metasploit-framework/lib/rex/ui/text/dispatcher_shell.rb:447:in `each'
/pentest/exploit/metasploit-framework/lib/rex/ui/text/dispatcher_shell.rb:447:in `run_single'
/pentest/exploit/metasploit-framework/lib/rex/ui/text/shell.rb:151:in `run'
/pentest/exploit/metasploit-framework/lib/metasploit/framework/command/console.rb:48:in `start'
/pentest/exploit/metasploit-framework/lib/metasploit/framework/command/base.rb:82:in `start'
./msfconsole:49:in `<main>'
msf5 > jobs -k asdf
[*] Stopping the following job(s): 0
[*] Stopping job 0
msf5 > jobs 

Jobs
====

No active jobs.

msf5 > 
bug

Most helpful comment

Seems like I should have a look.

All 3 comments

Seems like I should have a look.

See #10665

Closed #10655 via #10665

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

handsomebeast picture handsomebeast  路  3Comments

adrianmihalko picture adrianmihalko  路  3Comments

miholtz picture miholtz  路  3Comments

XSecr3t picture XSecr3t  路  3Comments

Funeoz picture Funeoz  路  3Comments