https://github.com/armmbed/mbed-cloud-client-example hits Fatal runtime failure on several ST boards.
++ MbedOS Error Info ++
Error Status: 0x80FF0100 Code: 256 Module: 255
Error Message: Fatal Run-time error
Location: 0x8053617
Error Value: 0x0
Current Thread:
For more info, visit: https://mbed.com/s/error?error=0x80FF0100&tgt=NUCLEO_F411RE
-- MbedOS Error Info --
SetSysClock failed
Nucleo F411RE, Nucleo F429ZI
GCC_ARM, ARMC6
dbf05ceaed89a67533b61634dd2aa18c1126494f
Not applicable
Should be reproducable with the https://github.com/armmbed/mbed-cloud-client-example
using NUCLEO_F429ZI as target as described in tutorial:
https://www.pelion.com/docs/device-management/current/connecting/mbed-os.html
cc @ARMmbed/team-st-mcd
@teetak01 thank you for raising this issue.Please take a look at the following comments:
What version of Mbed OS are you using (tag or sha)?
It would help if you could also specify the versions of any tools you are using?
NOTE: If there are fields which are not applicable then please just add 'n/a' or 'None'.This indicates to us that at least all the fields have been considered.
Please update the issue header with the missing information, the issue will not be mirroredto our internal defect tracking system or investigated until this has been fully resolved.
@teetak01 looks like the sha has been rejected because it doesn't follow either the short form GitHub format or the full sha ?
Well, that is output from mbed ls
|- mbed-os (#dbf05ceaed89)
I think that should be acceptable format?
Hi
In mbed-cloud-client-example, where does bootloader come from ?
"target.bootloader_img" : "tools/mbed-bootloader-nucleo_f429zi-internal_flash-no_rot-v4.1.0.bin",
Thx
Well, that is output from mbed ls
|- mbed-os (#dbf05ceaed89)I think that should be acceptable format?
Mmmm interesting that would imply mbed ls is not providing a format normally used by github....
It seems that after #12626 (and up to date drivers), system clock PLL can not be configured if PLL is already configured, which is the case with bootloader.
@LMESTM
Thanks @jeromecoutant . Could this be fixed? We would like to have this in beta1 release (today all PR are in for beta1)
Could you check #12924 ?
Thank you for raising this detailed GitHub issue. I am now notifying our internal issue triagers.
Internal Jira reference: https://jira.arm.com/browse/MBOTRIAGE-2657
Hi @jeromecoutant I tested your fix and it works fine! Thanks for the quick response.