Would be great if you had a LESS version
volnei
All 60 comments
I concur. This would be awesome if there was LESS support
AWMooreCO
on 13 Jan 2015
:+1:
globeFrEak
on 15 Jan 2015
Hey guys!!! =)
Please, this is very relevant... take look at this.
https://www.npmjs.com/package/grunt-refactor
volnei
on 5 Feb 2015
+1, Less is really easer to use maintain and compile.
ygor27
on 6 Feb 2015
+1 My team is eager to start using Materialize, but we are waiting for LESS version.
marciomunhoz
on 6 Feb 2015
we need the LESS version, would be great.
faelvasco
on 6 Feb 2015
+1... I think it would be really important. LESS is easer to work
clouzada81
on 6 Feb 2015
+1 A LESS version would be great. Much easier.
eliveltonmendes
on 6 Feb 2015
Support for Less would be awesome!!
JohnJr
on 6 Feb 2015
+1 LESS
vsalvalagio
on 6 Feb 2015
LESS
BatistaGabriel
on 6 Feb 2015
LESS please
Pandahisham
on 7 Feb 2015
+1
hebbet
on 23 Feb 2015
+1
svenvandescheur
on 4 Apr 2015
+1
Dragsbaek
on 20 Apr 2015
+1
roaringbits
on 30 Apr 2015
+1
samehkamaleldin
on 5 May 2015
+1
marvincaspar
on 9 May 2015
+1
NicolasPio
on 12 May 2015
Might give this a go myself.
roaringbits
on 13 May 2015
+1 This would let people who use LESS to import Materialize directly into their code.
CurosMJ
on 23 May 2015
please allow less :( - 99% of my css is less compiled
Teranode
on 6 Jun 2015
+1
LESS would be less instead of S(ass)
tifidy
on 9 Jun 2015
+1 It would be awesome :)
ilourt
on 16 Jun 2015
:+1:
ricardodovalle
on 16 Jun 2015
As long as it doesn't replace SASS!
But it would mean more work to keep up to date both LESS and SASS to do the same job.
gnicol-bzh
on 17 Jun 2015
+1
blomdahldaniel
on 2 Jul 2015
+1
stivaugoin
on 17 Jul 2015
+1
alexdcox
on 19 Jul 2015
:+1: Is anyone actually working on this? From what I can see, all one would need to do is make a copy of everything in the SASS folder, convert it to LESS, and then include less wherever the SASS files were getting included/referenced... Is that all there is to it?
himynameisdave
on 22 Jul 2015
+1
Sinark
on 15 Sep 2015
LESS !
loenk2x
on 15 Oct 2015
+1 LESS
insideaem
on 29 Oct 2015
+1 LESS.
Nikofoxxx
on 17 Nov 2015
Who can list compelling reasons why migrate on less?
laverix
on 17 Nov 2015
Don't you think that there is a big enough crowd that prefer LESS? A lot of
people with Twitter Bootstrap background knows LESS better and I do think
that there is a whole lot of people with that background. With that said,
SASS is getting more and more dominant and even Bootstrap is letting go of
LESS in their Bootstrap 4 so, as of now, i cannot see any reason except
convenience for all the people that prefer LESS, but I don't know in what
approach you have towards your users.
2015-11-17 13:48 GMT+01:00 Valery Lyatevich [email protected]:
Who can list compelling reasons why migrate on less?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/Dogfalo/materialize/issues/313#issuecomment-157362547
.
blomdahldaniel
on 17 Nov 2015
+1
Maelstromeous
on 28 Nov 2015
+1 Less
mistriel
on 2 Dec 2015
+1 for Less
bymarcojacinto
on 7 Dec 2015
+1 still wanted ;)
VitoHusky
on 11 Jan 2016
+1 for Less
delsanic
on 19 Jan 2016
+1
kkorir
on 10 Mar 2016
+1
caesay
on 4 Apr 2016
+1
barbiebrega
on 30 Apr 2016
This would allow Materialize to work with Sails.js (which use Less) by default and would be awesome for fast development
eric-burel
on 1 May 2016
+1
YugzLess
on 11 May 2016
+1
marcingolenia
on 12 May 2016
++ !
niittymaa
on 18 May 2016
+1
dpineda64
on 18 May 2016
+1
markotom
on 18 May 2016
+1
iaderlorduy
on 13 Jul 2016
+1
machiaveli88
on 13 Jul 2016
+1
ralphbert
on 22 Jul 2016
+1
cderche
on 19 Aug 2016
+2 1 for ego
ghost
on 22 Aug 2016
There are so many people left +1 comment here, that more than enough to develop a fork of MarerializeCSS with LESS, instead of asking 4 busy core devs :smile:
kmmbvnr
on 22 Aug 2016
I agree with @kmmbvnr that there are a "big enough crowd that prefer LESS" to do something about it, then someone ought to do something, right?
Also, that are arguably more reasons to keep SASS only than to have a LESS version, or even both of them. The popularity of something does not necessarily indicate any form of superiority. Because IDE vs SCSI, VHS vs Betamax, Blue-ray vs HD DVD, to name but a few, were popular, and yet not necessarily the best technological choices.
The module is published with a pre-built CSS file that can easily be merged with other CSS files, generated or not. I don't see a good reason to fiddle with the SASS anyway; extend the styles with your own custom selectors and styles!
yanickrochon
on 24 Nov 2016
This isn't something that we think would be a good use of our time, so we won't be maintaining a LESS version. If someone does make their own however, post it here to help people out 👍
Dogfalo
on 2 Feb 2017
totally understandable though, this lib wasn't built on Less.
himynameisdave
on 2 Feb 2017
+1 Less!
TheRoxDEV
on 13 Jan 2018
Related issues
alexknipfer
·
3Comments
hartwork
·
3Comments
ericlormul
·
3Comments
lpgeiger
·
3Comments
Robouste
·
3Comments